If the CT6 comes in at the same weight, the 2.0L will move it along ok. 0-60 in the CTS 2.0L in ~6.2 seconds, the V6 is roughly 6.0L.
That's a big V6
![Grin ;D](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/grin.gif)
And the naming convention truly is stupid, but whatever...that also won't deter sales. Nor will the lack of a V8 - 400hp is nothing to sneeze at, and not many people will care about how many cylinders it has - the low-end torques (all 400 of them!) will make up for it.
The pricing is spot on. Even at $100k, you know out-the-door OTR pricing for the top model won't exceed $90k taxes in
![Tongue :P](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/tongue.gif)
...and even if it does, you're getting industry firsts and decent tech without the "FGC" concerns (albeit, now you have the GM-related concerns). Hell, it's actually a pretty compelling package.
...but, as pointed out:
And it's still using the control stalks from the Cruze? ![:rofl2:](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/rofl.gif)
^^ this should not be, and CUE (specifically the sliders) is still too irritating to use.