« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Long-Term Test Update 4: 2016 Mazda CX-3  (Read 2290 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
Long-Term Test Update 4: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« on: October 05, 2015, 06:28:38 am »
 The Exhausted Review in Two edition.
Jeff Voth takes the wheel this week for an Exhausted Review in Two.
Read More...
Logged

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13593
  • Carma: +774/-2132
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '24 Crosstrek Wilderness
Re: Long-Term Test Update 4: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2015, 03:44:46 pm »
Much better video, Jeff!
Logged

Offline JRM

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 693
  • Carma: +22/-94
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2014 VW Passat TSI, 2004 Pontiac Vibe AWD
Re: Long-Term Test Update 4: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2015, 09:22:40 am »
These tiny vehicles s/b classed separately form the CUV/SUV class.  The utility part of the equation simply isn't there, imo.  And the swoopy styling just doesn't fit on such small vehicles. 
Logged

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13593
  • Carma: +774/-2132
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '24 Crosstrek Wilderness
Re: Long-Term Test Update 4: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2015, 03:14:49 pm »
Quote from: JRM on October 06, 2015, 09:22:40 am
These tiny vehicles s/b classed separately form the CUV/SUV class.  The utility part of the equation simply isn't there, imo.  And the swoopy styling just doesn't fit on such small vehicles.
"_UV" is a fashion statement over a quotient of functionality.  Accept the change.
Logged

Offline disngaj

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Carma: +2/-1
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Toyota 4Runner
Re: Long-Term Test Update 4: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2015, 04:10:57 pm »
Isn't this review supposed to be a "long-term update" of a car at 8,957 km?; instead, it is an overview of a new car. Haven't we already seen that (and do we really need someone to tell us how it looks)?
Logged

Offline JacobBlack

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2593
  • Carma: +440/-499
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Ford F-150
Re: Long-Term Test Update 4: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2015, 04:15:58 pm »
Fair point, well made.
I think you'll enjoy update No.5.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »