i don't think that's it...i believe the 2.slow debuted in 1992 or 1993...it was likely competitive at that time, but times have changed.
We had a 1997 Cavalier with the single OHV, cast-iron, 2.2L 4-banger rated at 120hp and 140lb-ft (later reduced in 1998 to 115hp/135lb-ft for emissions
![:rofl2:](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/rofl.gif)
). It always felt fine, despite being 'mated' to a 3-speed automatic (
![ROFL :rofl:](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/rofl9wz.gif)
). Yet, somehow, that powertrain was easier to live with than many modern ones (especially DCTs with their odd low-speed behaviour). Highway passing was a nightmare with that 3-speed auto, though.
In any event, there's nothing wrong (or exciting) about VW's 6-speed slushbox, but it mustn't be thoroughly modern if the manual still gets better fuel economy. While no DSG (which is probably a good thing), the 1.4T will be a great 'starter' motor...think of what it'd do with a properly made transmission (looking at Subaru's or Toyota's CVTs - purely in terms of fuel economy).
...but, as pointed out by a brilliant JohnnyMac, that's not what the Jetta is. What the Jetta is, is a perfect econobox for those looking at a larger-than-compact compact at a cheap price with VW's 'fun-to-drive' attitude. To that end, I'd love to see a head-to-head between the Corolla or Civic and this Jetta Trendline+. No highlines, LE Ecos, or EX trims...just the volume models that hover around $20,000. That, my friends, would be the ultimate in terms of the "easy to live with commuter/single family-on-a-budget vehicle" comparo.
By the way, Chris, incredible opening - what a way to frame just how relevant this new engine is!!
![Beer :cheers:](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/cheers.gif)