Way too far into Tahoe range to even consider it.
Sent from my SM-G900W8 using Tapatalk
Agreed, same here. The Tahoe is much better.
"Much better" - why? Tahoe is better at towing, and certainly better for off-road ability. It also has a lot more power - but also carries around nearly a 1000 pounds more weight.
For most people, is it really a "much better" vehicle? The Yukon/Tahoe don't ride or handle as well as the Lambda triplets, the 3rd row is terrible in the Tahoe/Yukon (try sitting in one - your knees will be close to your head), and it has substantially less cargo space. And while fuel-efficient for the class, the Tahoe/Yukon are still harder on gas than the Lambdas.
I don't get all the love for the Tahoe and Yukon (in short wheelbase - I can see the utility of the Suburban / Yukon XL). Because the 3rd row and cargo space are so poor, they are NOT good 6+ passenger vehicles. Here's my personal algorithm on these vehicles:
If I am carrying 6+ people (and their stuff) routinely, and need to tow something heavy, I'd look at a Suburban (or a 2500 van).
If I am carrying 6+ people (and their stuff) routinely, but NOT towing something heavy, I'd look at a 7-passenger CUV (or better yet, a minivan - but that's a whole 'nuther issue for some people...)
If I am carrying < 6 people (and their stuff) routinely, and need to tow something heavy, then a crew cab truck. It makes so much more financial and practical sense than a Tahoe. And if I REALLY wanted a SUV instead - JGC or Durango with hemi!!