« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3  (Read 9117 times)

Offline mrori

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • Carma: +1/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #20 on: September 23, 2015, 09:37:10 am »
Quote from: mlin32 on September 01, 2015, 11:52:23 am
Serious question though.........what is Stitcher? Pandora I know of (and don't have, or want to use), but I remember things like Aha and Stitcher on the Mazda3 I used to have and was confused as to what they are.

I thought Pandora only available in the US.
Logged

Offline 84im

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2391
  • Carma: +24/-81
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2015 BMW X1, 2003 Chevy Tracker, 1974 VW Dune Buggy, and 1974 VW Thing
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm »
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.
Logged
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kickboxing.

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13593
  • Carma: +774/-2132
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '24 Crosstrek Wilderness
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2015, 12:34:10 pm »
Quote from: 84im on September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.
Drive it - you'll change your mind.  I'd take a CX-3 over a Mazda3 Sport any day.
Logged

Offline SKYMTL

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1806
  • Carma: +30/-77
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2019 BMW 440i, 2014 Mazda 3 GT Sport
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2015, 12:50:32 pm »
Quote from: 84im on September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.

The interior feels smaller than my Mazda 3 though.  Maybe it's the design but the back seat in particular feels really cramped. 
Logged

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13593
  • Carma: +774/-2132
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '24 Crosstrek Wilderness
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2015, 01:30:55 pm »
Quote from: SKYMTL on September 24, 2015, 12:50:32 pm
Quote from: 84im on September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.

The interior feels smaller than my Mazda 3 though.  Maybe it's the design but the back seat in particular feels really cramped.
Depends on what you're going for...it's not cramped for 2, though I haven't sat in both back-to-back.
Logged

Offline Oldsguy

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 717
  • Carma: +70/-953
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2015, 05:12:37 pm »
Quote from: 84im on September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.

I understood it was actually a Mazda 2. That would also explain the lack of interior space.
Logged
Since October 2015 the Junior PM has been in office.  Record mega-Billion deficits as he p*sses away our future.  An economy gutted. Stinky POTHEADS rejoice. We are going down the drain.

Offline S. Aureus

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 47
  • Carma: +6/-8
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Subaru Outback 2014
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2015, 09:59:21 pm »
Quote from: 84im on September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.
It is not really jacked up. What's the ground clearance on CX3? Around 150-160 mm, IIRC. Same as 1992 Corolla.
Logged

Offline dkaz

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14005
  • Carma: +291/-389
  • Gender: Male
  • Flip flop
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 12 Mazda 5 GT 6MT
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #27 on: September 25, 2015, 12:45:58 pm »
Quote from: 84im on September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 Mazda2 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.

Just joining the choir but fixed.  ;)
Logged

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33327
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #28 on: September 25, 2015, 09:13:14 pm »
It's easy to forget the CX-3 is based on the Mazda2, as they used "3" in the name.  As much as I like the CX-3, the much better carg area of the HR-V would probably win me over were I comparing the two.  In the segment, the not-quite-in-the-segment-but-close-enough Crosstrek would win my money - just a bit larger, tons of ground clearance and Subaru AWD.

But, they're all nifty little hatches with some form of AWD that I am starting to see lots of.
Logged

Offline Blueprint

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 10557
  • Carma: +171/-233
  • Gender: Male
  • member since way back when
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2024 Mazda CX-90 GS-L PHEV, 2022 Subaru Crosstrek Limited, 1975 Triumph TR6
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #29 on: September 26, 2015, 08:22:37 pm »
Quote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 28, 2015, 06:21:09 pm
Quote from: Scaerio on August 28, 2015, 06:13:49 pm
Quote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 28, 2015, 02:15:04 pm
The largely featureless dash only emphasizes how ugly the tacked on iPad is.

I can't believe that Audi and Mercedes get away with this on the A3, CLA, and GLA...

NOT WITH ME, THEY DON'T!  ;D

I was a hater until I drove a Mazda3 GT in a comparo. The screen location really works well, and you're not stuck with a high, blocky dash like the Corolla's.
Logged
Traffic engineer/project manager & part time auto journalist

Offline Sir Osis of Liver

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 28596
  • Carma: +1376/-1726
  • Gender: Male
  • Ramblin' man
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 KTM DUKE 390, 2019 VW Jetta GLI 35th Anniversary
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2015, 10:52:35 am »
Quote from: Blueprint on September 26, 2015, 08:22:37 pm
Quote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 28, 2015, 06:21:09 pm
Quote from: Scaerio on August 28, 2015, 06:13:49 pm
Quote from: Sir Osis of Liver on August 28, 2015, 02:15:04 pm
The largely featureless dash only emphasizes how ugly the tacked on iPad is.

I can't believe that Audi and Mercedes get away with this on the A3, CLA, and GLA...

NOT WITH ME, THEY DON'T!  ;D

I was a hater until I drove a Mazda3 GT in a comparo. The screen location really works well, and you're not stuck with a high, blocky dash like the Corolla's.
I tried the Mazda3 and 6 and noped right out of there.

Logged
On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

H. L. Mencken

Offline NLCAR

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Carma: +0/-5
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2012 Tiguan Highline Sport, 2011 TTS
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #31 on: September 29, 2015, 04:50:08 am »
How do the LED headlights compare to a car that has stock HID headlights? Night driving safety is important to me.
Logged

Offline greengs

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1099
  • Carma: +26/-57
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 BRZ
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #32 on: September 29, 2015, 09:36:43 am »
Quote from: No-san on September 24, 2015, 01:30:55 pm
Quote from: SKYMTL on September 24, 2015, 12:50:32 pm
Quote from: 84im on September 24, 2015, 12:25:12 pm
The CX3 is really nothing more than a smaller Mazda3 with a jacked-up suspension and an all wheel drive option. Still, I like it.

The interior feels smaller than my Mazda 3 though.  Maybe it's the design but the back seat in particular feels really cramped.
Depends on what you're going for...it's not cramped for 2, though I haven't sat in both back-to-back.

It's 7.3" shorter than Mazda 3.  I do have to say that it looks great though.
Logged

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13593
  • Carma: +774/-2132
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '24 Crosstrek Wilderness
Re: Long-Term Test Update 3: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #33 on: September 29, 2015, 09:59:04 am »
a lot of that loss comes in the front end (not quite as clown-shoed as the Mazda3).  Yes, the trunk and back seat are tight, but not appreciably worse than the Mazda3 hatch.

Lady No-san's mother went from a Mazda3 hatch, and then when Lady No-san's father bought the 2001 911 Turbo, his then-current 2014 CX-5 GT went to Lady No-san's mother.  She hated it and traded it in early (lease) for the CX-3 - the price difference was something like $11/month saved...the CX-3 is expensive, IMO, for what it is compared to other Mazda offerings.  So she now drives a loaded CX-3.

How does she feel about the CX-3?  She fricken LOVES it.  Absolute love.  The old, old folks (90 and 92) find it much easier to get in/out of the CX-3 than it was for both the CX-5 and the Mazda3 hatch, and neither complains of lack of room in the rear seats.  YMMV.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »