Author Topic: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3  (Read 22587 times)

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14603
  • Carma: +240/-570
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #40 on: May 31, 2015, 12:09:58 pm »
Deez funny furrin' cars, do dey runs on american gasolines or only furrin oil?
You can't just have your characters announce how they feel.
That makes me feel angry!

Present: 15.5 V60 T6 + Polestar, 17 MDX
Sometimes Borrow: 11 GLK350
Dark and Twisted Past: 13 TL AWD, 07 Z4 3.0si, 07 CLK550, 06 TSX, 07 Civic, 01 Grandma!

Offline chignectohead

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 267
  • Carma: +31/-195
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2019 Mazda6 2.5t
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #41 on: June 05, 2015, 12:31:02 am »
I asked this question on the main review, but is it possible Jacob, to have a squint at the rear suspension on your AWD CX-3 long-termer?

Australian reviews say it's not the dreaded torsion-beam, but a deDion tube with separate longitudinal and lateral links for each rear wheel.  Not surprising because the torsion beam would get in the way of the driveshaft, and I've never heard of a torsion beam with a driven rear axle. They also say the AWD version rides and handles better.

Enquiring minds need to know.

Offline mixmanmash

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5240
  • Carma: +103/-326
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2014 Honda Odyssey Touring; 1993 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo; 1990 Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo; 2009 Nissan Rogue S AWD (wife's); 2002 Mazda Protege ES-GT (retired)
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #42 on: June 05, 2015, 11:05:25 am »
I asked this question on the main review, but is it possible Jacob, to have a squint at the rear suspension on your AWD CX-3 long-termer?

Australian reviews say it's not the dreaded torsion-beam, but a deDion tube with separate longitudinal and lateral links for each rear wheel.  Not surprising because the torsion beam would get in the way of the driveshaft, and I've never heard of a torsion beam with a driven rear axle. They also say the AWD version rides and handles better.

Enquiring minds need to know.
I agree.  Can't have a torsion beam with a rear axle.

Offline dirtyjeffer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 17120
  • Carma: +296/-1312
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2021 Toyota Venza Limited, 2016 Kia Sorento EX AWD
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #43 on: June 05, 2015, 12:51:00 pm »
Considering Mazda is a Japanese company, right hand drive would be normal.  At the Edmonton motor show, they brought a CX-3, but it was right hand drive.  The confusion on peoples faces was hilarious.
i know that, but surely a RHD version exists for pics to be taken of?
When you've lost the argument, admit defeat and hit the smite button.

Offline jyarkony

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
  • Carma: +119/-153
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Autos.ca
  • Cars: 2003 VW Jetta Wagon 1.8T; 2001 VW GTI VR6
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #44 on: June 05, 2015, 02:29:13 pm »

The dealership knew nothing of that "dealer-installed" arm rest, either, by the way, JY.

i'll check
Do I contradict myself?
Very well then I contradict myself,
(I am large, I contain multitudes.)
                                                        –Walt Whitman

Offline jyarkony

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
  • Carma: +119/-153
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • Autos.ca
  • Cars: 2003 VW Jetta Wagon 1.8T; 2001 VW GTI VR6
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #45 on: June 05, 2015, 05:20:06 pm »

The dealership knew nothing of that "dealer-installed" arm rest, either, by the way, JY.

i'll check

Mazda Canada estimates it'll be arriving Aug/Sept:

"The armrest is indeed coming, but the development of this accessory was led by the fine folks at Mazda USA, who are not launching the CX-3 until Aug/Sept timeframe, which is when the armrest will become available."

Offline OliverD

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18835
  • Carma: +257/-777
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 328i Touring, 1998 Jaguar XJR, 2024 Mini Cooper S
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #46 on: June 06, 2015, 11:44:49 am »
Interesting that it was launched earlier in Canada.

On a related not, Honda sold 7500 HR-Vs in the U.S. last month – and it only went on sale mid-month so that is the number sold in two weeks. This segment is crazy hot right now.

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33327
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #47 on: June 06, 2015, 11:48:58 am »
Subaru seems to be ahead of the curve yet again!!

Yeah, this segment is going to explode as the cars appeal big time to both young and old people.

Offline aquadorhj

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7611
  • Carma: +271/-265
    • View Profile
  • Cars: MB SLK 55, Lexus NX, E46 M3, Honda Fit, VW Jetta, VW Rabbit, Saturn SC, Nissan NX,
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #48 on: June 06, 2015, 05:01:53 pm »
went and looked at it at the dealership today.


sat in it.  didn't drive it.

little taller than rabbit, interior space is quite very small.

sunroof is a joke. 

interior quality is OK for the price.
the seat is comfy.

seat set at my driving position, there isn't much room in the rear seat.  and headroom is appalling at the rear seat.
I just came back home after.

Driving thrills makes my wallet lighter.. and therefore makes me faster because i'm shedding weight... :D

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33327
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #49 on: June 06, 2015, 06:43:23 pm »
I'd still go for the Crosstrek - oodles of ground clearance and awesome AWD.  But, the Mazda will move off the floor and it's a great product for them to have.

Offline OliverD

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18835
  • Carma: +257/-777
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 328i Touring, 1998 Jaguar XJR, 2024 Mini Cooper S
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #50 on: June 06, 2015, 06:44:28 pm »
sunroof is a joke. 

I don't understand why Mazda can't put panoramic sunroofs into its CUVs.

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33327
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #51 on: June 06, 2015, 06:49:32 pm »
Too swoopy roofline?

Offline mlin32

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Carma: +65/-419
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 Peugeot 308 GT; 2015 Yamaha YZF-R3
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #52 on: June 06, 2015, 08:02:32 pm »
sunroof is a joke. 

I don't understand why Mazda can't put panoramic sunroofs into its CUVs.
Half-assed engineering.
ø cons: Peugeot 308: Yamaha R3 [/URL]

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14603
  • Carma: +240/-570
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #53 on: June 07, 2015, 12:39:04 pm »
Honda also doesn't do pana roofs I believe. Even in the Acura lineup... Maybe the MDX has one not sure.

Actually it seems like pana roof is just not a Japanese thing as I'm pretty sure the Lexus IS / GS and Infiniti Q50 also don't have them iirc.

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33327
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #54 on: June 07, 2015, 12:42:11 pm »
Subaru was one of the only non-Yuros to do a huge sunroof.  They had two sunroofs on the old OBW and a giant single unit on the Forester.

Mazda gave us the Miata and said "all the sunroof you want!!"

Offline Julie

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7278
  • Carma: +359/-366
  • Gender: Female
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: nb miata, nc mx-5, e92 m3, mk6 gti
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #55 on: June 07, 2015, 12:46:13 pm »
went and looked at it at the dealership today.


sat in it.  didn't drive it.

little taller than rabbit, interior space is quite very small.

sunroof is a joke. 

interior quality is OK for the price.
the seat is comfy.

seat set at my driving position, there isn't much room in the rear seat.  and headroom is appalling at the rear seat.
I just came back home after.

interesting aqua...

how much taller than your rabbit, would you estimate roughly?

I like sitting higher up and driving dynamics but looks like this one's missing space.

Offline OliverD

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18835
  • Carma: +257/-777
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 BMW 328i Touring, 1998 Jaguar XJR, 2024 Mini Cooper S
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #56 on: June 07, 2015, 01:08:10 pm »
Subaru was one of the only non-Yuros to do a huge sunroof.  They had two sunroofs on the old OBW and a giant single unit on the Forester.

Then they took it away from the Outback. Dumb move IMO.

Offline jman72

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 184
  • Carma: +6/-5
  • Gender: Male
  • petrolhead
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2010 Golf GTI
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #57 on: June 07, 2015, 04:33:49 pm »
I saw this at the dealership a couple of weeks ago. A few things jumped out at me:

.1) Looks very nice overall at per the reviews. Better than the 3 IMO
.2) It's a LOT smaller than the CX-5
.3) The black plastic around the wheel arches is too thick and really looks "tacked on" compared to the more integrated design on the CX-5
.4) 16" wheels look terrible - 17" should gave been the base size




Offline mlin32

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Carma: +65/-419
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 Peugeot 308 GT; 2015 Yamaha YZF-R3
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #58 on: June 07, 2015, 09:50:17 pm »
Honda also doesn't do pana roofs I believe. Even in the Acura lineup... Maybe the MDX has one not sure.

Actually it seems like pana roof is just not a Japanese thing as I'm pretty sure the Lexus IS / GS and Infiniti Q50 also don't have them iirc.
The Honda CR-V and HR-V are offered with a panoramic moonroof in Europe. This is pretty much required to be optional in order to be competitive in the European market.

Offline Ron

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 90
  • Carma: +2/-2
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Mazda 3 GT, 2012 Mazda 5 GT
Re: Long-Term Test Arrival: 2016 Mazda CX-3
« Reply #59 on: June 08, 2015, 08:59:01 am »
Was invited for a 'private' viewing for one of these this weekend and since the wife initially liked the look of the CX-3 from the photos we spent a lazy afternoon doing just that. Some lasting impressions:

1. It looks really odd in person. Both the wife and I had the same feeling. The overall shape with the large tires just seemed off to us. It is also very small in comparison to the say the CX-5 or Mazda 5.
2. We test drove a fully loaded GT model. First looks in the interior show an upscale vehicle. A lot of nice touches with the leather. It is a lot roomier on the inside than you would first think. (I am 6'1") The rear is a little tight but comparable or better than my Mazda 3. Ditto to the storage space. Access for a child's car seat seems better than my Mazda 3.
3. Like the majority of Mazdas, it really is a hoot to drive. And like many smaller cars, the small size seemed to encourage spirited driving. The power seemed adequate and the engine/automatic felt well meshed. I didn't recall any hunting for gears or waiting etc. The sales lady even suggested a short section of gravel road to try!

Even if we could get past the looks, (we couldn't) for our needs and wants, ie a family, this car is simply not practical. However, we were definitely impressed with the luxurious interior and fun to drive factor. As I recall the fully loaded model was 30k so not cheap either. Though it is a very well put together little car, I am curious who the intended market is.