Author Topic: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil  (Read 22515 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« on: May 25, 2015, 06:25:03 am »

For many drivers, synthetic oil might be overkill.
Read More...

Offline Ex-airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 40151
  • Carma: +729/-1584
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Silverado 1500 LTZ ext ended cab , 2013 Lexus RX-350 F Sport
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2015, 06:43:11 am »
Are you really having money, synthetic oil you can easily do 25,000 km between oil changes (  recommended levels for a 2000 e46) , old time oil is every 5,000 km ,

Offline jamesautos

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 375
  • Carma: +14/-59
    • View Profile
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2015, 07:12:23 am »
Stop your Monday rant... :rofl2:
majority of people don't do their own oil change and they don't even know there are different weight of motor oil. People rarely do oil change when they are suppose to anyways. Most people use quik lube places or worse Walmart to get their oil change for $30...
I highly doubt synthetic oil is high on people's mind. But for those who do, it's not a matter of necessity. Their cars are their babies that always deserve the best. It's like feeding your baby regular baby food vs organic baby food...are there differences? Yes... do I care what you think about how I feed my baby? no ;D
« Last Edit: May 25, 2015, 07:20:10 am by jamesautos »

Offline tpl

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 23909
  • Carma: +298/-675
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2022 Taos
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2015, 07:31:40 am »
I just put the manufacturer specified oil in my engines and change it at sensible intervals.

Q5   VW spec synthetic 5w-40   they say change at 16,000 I change at 8000
Fit   This MkII fit specifies a Honda 0w-20 which like all (AFAIK)  0w oils is at least a partial synthetic. Change interval on maintenance minder is between 11 and
           12000 or once a year...we do it once a year as the car has only just got to 12,000 after 22 months.

Previous.  M-B B250  maintenance minder said every 12,000 or once a year with an MB spec 5w-40 or 0w-40 synthetic. Sold just as it got to 12,000.
                Mk5 GTI, A4 1.8T   both said   a VW spec synthetic and change at 16,000   Both changed at 8000.
                BMW 330Xi   5w-30 or 5w-40 synthetic at about 22,000 to 25,000 kms    Changed every 8000
                MkI Fit  5w-20 dino oil, maintenance minder on that car went off at 8000 or once a year. Only in one year did we ( she actually!) do enough kms to change
                before the year was up.

 The only one of the above which used any oil was the BMW which used perhaps 1/4 litre in 8000 kms and stopped using oil at around 20,000 kms or so.

So from this I draw the conclusion that the FGC engine manufacturers see an advantage in synthetic oil  for normal road cars in this climate...why would one argue?  Let alone any potential warranty issues.
The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution.

Offline northsparrow

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 314
  • Carma: +13/-27
    • View Profile
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2015, 07:56:38 am »
I agree with Airbalancer.

I use top spec PAO synthetic rated for 40,000 km with a long life filter and change it once a year while driving a fraction
of the yearly maximum.

After 10 years my engine is in perfect condition plus I save a lot of cash and more importantly time by not doing as many oil changes.

Off the shelf, mineral oil based synthetic can be picked up on sale for the same price as conventional oil so why use old dinosaurs to
lubricate your engine?

Offline pcsp

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 463
  • Carma: +38/-53
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2013 Nissan Juke AWD (current), 2008 HHR SS (current), 1974 Mazda 929, Triumph TR6, VW Diesel PU, 1981 VW Cabriolet, 1987 Dodge Raider, etc.
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2015, 08:01:06 am »
I'm also a fan of saving money and getting value. That's why I don't seek out the most expensive synthetic and change it every 3,000-5,000 km. I choose synthetic because of the PROVEN benefits (not the anecdotal stuff), it has in both everyday driving and extreme use. No one can know when they will subject their vehicle to occasions of extreme use. May not be intentional, may not be constant, but it will happen. I'm quite comfortable having the oil changed twice a year no matter the mileage (May and November) and using synthetic for which I usually pay between $15 and $25 per four liters. Probably costs me an extra $10-$25 per vehicle annually.

Offline Great_Big_Abyss

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13930
  • Carma: +270/-457
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2019 Mazda CX-5
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2015, 10:23:12 am »
Justin,

You should have mentioned the API seal that is on bottles of oil.  As long as the bottle of oil you buy as the API seal on it, it's good enough for you to run in your car, given the right viscosity, of course.

AND, what do you run in your viper?  I would argue that the big, understressed 8.0L V10 in the Viper does less work per cube than the frantic little 2.0L in the MR2.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2015, 10:30:22 am by Great_Big_Abyss »

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14603
  • Carma: +240/-570
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2015, 11:16:13 am »
Given that the main cost is labour + time + hassle I'd rather put the good stuff in and change it when the maintenance minder is up.

For the GLK + V60 its around 15-16k.
The Acura is only 9k but it has only 4.4L sump.
You can't just have your characters announce how they feel.
That makes me feel angry!

Present: 15.5 V60 T6 + Polestar, 17 MDX
Sometimes Borrow: 11 GLK350
Dark and Twisted Past: 13 TL AWD, 07 Z4 3.0si, 07 CLK550, 06 TSX, 07 Civic, 01 Grandma!

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 38392
  • Carma: +702/-1347
  • Gender: Male
  • “It’s never crowded along the extra mile.”
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD.2004 Honda S2000 Bikes: Giant Defy Avdvanced 0. Giant Talon 29 "hardtail"
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2015, 11:41:44 am »
Good thing I'm not one of the many. Why cheap out on oil to save a few bucks on cars worth $xx,xxx.xx?

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33323
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2015, 12:28:08 pm »
Anyone that lives somewhere where it gets cold in the winter knows one good reason to use synthetic oil: much easier cold starts and fast circulation.

And I agree with Snowie: in terms of operating a car, the additional cost of synthetic over regular oil is pretty small.

You will also probably recoup some of that money in resale.  When I have sold cars (instead of wearing them out completely!) the presentation of anal-retentive service records including full-synth oil means I've usually sold at the higher end of the price spectrum.

Offline wing

  • Big Wig
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 26910
  • Carma: +279/-320
  • Gender: Male
  • If you ain't first ... you're last!
    • View Profile
    • Drivesideways
  • Cars: 2009 Lexus ISF, 2009 Lexus LX570,2011 Audi A5 Touring Car
Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2015, 12:39:00 pm »
All my cars call for synthetic in the manual.   Who am I to argue with the people that designed my car?

Cold starts and extreme heat,  I think it's worth it.   I change the oil twice a year around 8k.

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 27890
  • Carma: +310/-6817
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobby Car: 15 Mustang Vert, V6, manual, 3.55 lsd; 2024 MDX Aspec; 2022 F150 TREMOR lifted
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2015, 12:42:52 pm »
Nice presentation from Mobil UNO

http://www.exxonmobil.com/AP-English/Files/about_who_Mobil1_supersyn_eng.pdf


0W40 Mobil 1 Eurospec for the BEAST  ;D.    Currently $5.79 litre x 6 @ your neighbourhood Esso Lubricant Distributor.

Like most domestic and Asian makers, Ford calls for 5W20  :P

Offline Solstice2006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 12681
  • Carma: +245/-468
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Hyundai Entourage, 2007 Buick Lucerne
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2015, 12:44:41 pm »
All my cars call for synthetic in the manual.   Who am I to argue with the people that designed my car?

Cold starts and extreme heat,  I think it's worth it.   I change the oil twice a year around 8k.

Exactly, I just go with the service recommendations.  Mine says 4 months or 8k. 

Offline tortoise

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15098
  • Carma: +236/-453
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #13 on: May 25, 2015, 12:59:22 pm »
Every 4 months seems way to frequent. So, if you drive 20k km per year you are changing your oil every 5k km. 

That a dealership schedule or a Mazda schedule.

I use  synthetic (typically group III) but I pick it up on sale so the extra cost is negligible.  We routinely have mornings below -20C and the cars seem to start and get going easier.

« Last Edit: May 25, 2015, 01:07:15 pm by tortoise »
Only the slow and dim know where they're going in life, and seldom is it worth the trip. - Tom Robbins.

Offline Triple Bob

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 18139
  • Carma: +308/-574
  • Gender: Male
  • Profesional Dash Stroker
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Tundra, GTI, Triumph Tiger, KTM, C63 AMG, FZ-09, Triumph Speed Triple, VW Golf Wagon TDI, BMW 535i, Honda CRF250L, Hyundai Genesis Coupe, Mitsubishi Outlander, Lotus Exige, Subaru Impreza, Peugeot 106, BMW Z4, Toyota MR2 MKIII, Ford Sierra Sapphire
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #14 on: May 25, 2015, 01:20:08 pm »
Anyone that lives somewhere where it gets cold in the winter knows one good reason to use synthetic oil: much easier cold starts and fast circulation.

And I agree with Snowie: in terms of operating a car, the additional cost of synthetic over regular oil is pretty small.

You will also probably recoup some of that money in resale.  When I have sold cars (instead of wearing them out completely!) the presentation of anal-retentive service records including full-synth oil means I've usually sold at the higher end of the price spectrum.

Agreed.

This article has so much wrong in it it's unbelievable that it's published on a car site.

Quote
It might help you get better mileage. It might offer more protection. It might make your engine last longer.

Might, might, might.

My logic is simpler, and backed up my numerous mechanic pals.

 ::)

Quote
Have you seen how they torture-test engines? Or how they torture-test engine oils?

Have you?  ::)

The extreme load testing isn't done 'beyond redline', it's done a full load for extended hours to essentially break the engine as fast as possible.  Then they can find out why, and blend different additives to help alleviate that particular issue.  The reason why this is relevant to Canada is annual temps from -40C to +40C, plus many short journeys and cold starts essentially produces similar wear characteristics.

With a good quality synthetic oil (better base and more expensive additives) there is much better resistance to shear, reduced breakdown, and significantly increased film strength.  The film strength part alone can reduce metal-metal contact by a significant amount, especially in harsh climates such as Canada.


Choosing a car based on reliability is like choosing a wife based solely because she is punctual. There is more to it than that...

Offline erich

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1474
  • Carma: +36/-125
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: current: 2023 Genesis G70 2.0t,2019 Infiniti QX50, previous:2017 Subaru Legacy, 2014 Mazda CX-5, 2012 Genesis Coupe 2.0T, 2010 Subaru Forrester, 2004 Honda Civic, 2000 SAAB 9-3, 2000 Dodge Caravan, 2000 VW Golf, 1996 Suzuki Baleno, 1990 Subary Justy 1.0GL
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #15 on: May 25, 2015, 01:30:21 pm »
SAAB and VW/Audi turbo engines had (have?) a sludging issue that required syntethic oil only. I will keep using full synth for any turbo engine (Genesis Coupe).
I use mineral oil in NA engines in non-performance cars (Civic, Forester).

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35577
  • Carma: +1424/-2123
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2020 Toyota Tundra, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #16 on: May 25, 2015, 01:45:45 pm »
Every car Ive even owned has gotten synthetic, for the extra few bucks, I think its worth it. Especially at -40 when the cars been outside of work the whole day.
Lighten up Francis.....

Offline HeliDriver

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 10845
  • Carma: +176/-235
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2023 Crosstrek Sport 6MT; 2011 Yukon XL 2500
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #17 on: May 25, 2015, 02:01:11 pm »
I sort of agree with the article, just given its limited premise: car is driven summer only.

I used to run Dino oil in my Civic and had no issues over 270,000 kms. And that car saw lots of track time and regular trips to its 8,000 rpm redline. (But I did switch to semi-syn "winter" oil for half the year.) I'd probably just go synthetic year-round in that car if I did it over again, but at the time I felt better about 5,000 km oil and filter changes than leaving synthetic (and the filter) in for longer.

But in general, synthetic is kind of a no-brainer, not only because winter, but also because it's not that much more expensive and a lot of new cars specifically call for it.

Offline jaari

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 274
  • Carma: +13/-36
    • View Profile
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #18 on: May 25, 2015, 02:04:30 pm »
I wonder what my Honda's  0/20 'full' synthetic is?
Is it a 'true' synthetic as some are just dino based with synthetic additives  ???

Our old '99 Accent got nothing but Supertech 5/30 1.99 a litre stuff and ahemm Fram filter every 5,000  lol
Her engine never had a issue in the 250,000 kms we had her.
The '15 Honda Crv so far has 4000kms on it and 90% oil life left.
I'm leery on leaving it in so long, but I guess the manufacturer knows what they are doing ?
« Last Edit: May 25, 2015, 02:12:24 pm by jaari »

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 27890
  • Carma: +310/-6817
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobby Car: 15 Mustang Vert, V6, manual, 3.55 lsd; 2024 MDX Aspec; 2022 F150 TREMOR lifted
Re: Monday Rant: You Don't Need Synthetic Oil
« Reply #19 on: May 25, 2015, 02:27:51 pm »
Is it a 'true' synthetic as some are just dino based with synthetic additives  ???

It will be a group III.  Be interesting to know which oil company supplies it.  Honda and Toyota dealers have a bulk 0W20 synthetic "blend" just to add confusion.  :rofl2: