but may also get an engine capable of running E85
DIE, ETHANOL [in gasoline], DIE!
As for the 100, who cares. Ford has turned my perception of them around, Chevy is starting to, but Chrysco has done d!ck-all. The Dart was a massive flop; I don't expect this to be any better.
As an aside, in Florida, I rented a Chevy Spark. I only needed it for 1 day to get me from Fort Lauderdale to Orlando. The car had 7 miles on the Odo when I got in - all the protective plastic was still on. That 82hp 1.2L inspired nothing, the steering was sh!t, the suspension was horrid, and the rear [laughing while typing] fold-down rear seats don't stay down, but I averaged 48.6MPG over 273miles, being 5.617 gallons used at $3.29/gal = $18.48 to do a nearly 4 hour drive, plus city driving around Orlando. Outstanding, simply outstanding. The interior was otherwise nicely appointed, and sightlines were pretty good.
Even the Daewoo-sourced Spark amazed me...right, back to Chrysler...unlike what you did with the Dart, wow me - I dare you.