...
I'm a big fan of the Civic as a value proposition, but it is falling behind in terms of value and materials used. Still, a better interior and some good tech may be all it needs to stay relevant.
Not impressed with the power output? Interesting but you had no qualms about the Corolla output.
I believe the Corolla has less hp.
I don't have a qualm with the Corolla's output, and I don't have a qualm about the Civic's either - it was a statement to show that it remains mid/low-pack when it comes to on paper power. I'm more concerned about 0-30 and 80-100 times than 0-100. All of these cars are sufficient in that regard.
My point, to be clear, was that since the press release makes claims to indicate that the Civic is one of the best C-segment cars ever, I'm a little surprised that they wouldn't try to match the competition where it matters (i.e. direct on-paper numbers, which is what consumers see/consider).
The Civic's aren't far from the bottom (if you ignore the 115hp Jetta), but rather than focus on a 3hp increase, focus on "enhanced drivability and mid-range torque" or something, if true.
I see far more 2014 Corolla LE Ecos than other trims; those 8hp and 'better fuel economy' promises seem to resonate well with Torontonians.
P.S.
The Dart, in my eyes, only beats out the Lancer, Cruze, and the base Jetta. I'd take any of the following before a Dart: Civic, Corolla, Focus, Forte, Impreza, Elantra, Sentra (though unlikely), etc. Even if that list is comprehensive, that would place the Dart as 8th on my list. It's not getting my cash no matter what, unless some awesome Game of Thrones manipulation is used.