We don't usually factor in reliability - the RAV4 was an entirely new model when this test happened, so judging reliability without any concrete information would be far too speculative. Our considerations are its primary function and operation as observed, rather than research into other potential ownership costs or concerns.
I personally would drive a refrigerator if it were the most reliable. Priority #1 for me is to keep up to date on oil changes, get in my car, turn the key and drive, EVERY day. That being said, I'm not so sure what's so confusing about the Rav4's interior. I've been driving one for a year and a half now. I see the CRV styling as 80's AMC Pacer meets Pontiac Aztec. My brother owns the 2013 CRV. The CRV's interior to me is like walking into your Grandma's kitchen. It's neat and clean but clearly is dated. You're right that both are fine vehicles but there's obviously some CRV bias there, as not everyone sees the CRV styling as desirable. I always call it the big butt car.
[/quote]
Welcome to the forum, and thanks for sharing.
Reliability should certainly be a consideration for anyone making a purchase as sizeable as a new vehicle. For us, we're unable measure reliability in any meaningful or long term way during a week-long review of a vehicle, so it would be unfair for us to report on it.
As for "some CRV bias" here, well, uhh, no. I've owned as many Toyotas as I have Hondas (1 each) and hold both companies in equally high regard, especially for their ability to make well-engineered, long-lasting products.
On the other hand, you've had 13 consecutive Toyotas? Maybe a bit of bias there?
