Author Topic: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012  (Read 15025 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« on: May 17, 2012, 04:05:01 am »
class=excerptimage>
Though the Impala sedan has had a few reliability problems, such as leaky gaskets on older 3.4-litre V6 engines, a well-kept Impala is a good value in the used car market, opines Contributing Editor, Chris Chase.

Read More...

Offline Gardiner Westbound

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 772
  • Carma: +22/-32
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2012, 06:43:27 am »
Have you ever wondered how much better GM would be if it spent $10 a car on quality improvements?
"When you invent a better mousetrap the mice tend to get smarter." - Willie Gingrich

Offline Whofan

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 80
  • Carma: +4/-8
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2012, 09:09:37 am »
We had a brand new 2003 LS loaded all the way to 2009, it was a great car, specially for HWY travel.

but in 2009 it was time to let it go, spend on repairs or buy a new one, we went for the new one.  (we might have been wrong, maybe we should have keep it, oh well)

got up to 60,000 on stock breaks, better than Ford, that's for sure at the time

Offline Mike

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5323
  • Carma: +172/-99
  • Gender: Male
  • Lurker
    • View Profile
  • Cars: A Beater and an Ascent
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #3 on: May 17, 2012, 12:24:23 pm »
For all their faults, these are great highway cruisers.  Now they have 300+ hp in a 3500 package.  For reference, that is more power and less weight than a Maxima

Offline Blueprint

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 10404
  • Carma: +171/-233
  • Gender: Male
  • member since way back when
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2024 Mazda CX-90 GS-L PHEV, 2022 Subaru Crosstrek Limited, 1975 Triumph TR6
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #4 on: May 17, 2012, 12:45:13 pm »
For all their faults, these are great highway cruisers.  Now they have 300+ hp in a 3500 package.  For reference, that is more power and less weight than a Maxima

Agreed.  Rented the previous gen a few times, and a basic one with the 3.4 netted me 8.5 l/100km over 1000km of mixed driving in Florida.  Great car for road trips, and the cops think you're one of them (and all the others let you through  ;D ).
Traffic engineer/project manager & part time auto journalist

Offline Vanstar

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1190
  • Carma: +40/-236
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Acura TL, 2015 Kia Rio5
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #5 on: May 17, 2012, 01:47:17 pm »
These cars make excellent used buys if you need a prairie cruiser. Ten thousand will get you a good, low km one off rental in these parts. That is a good deal if you need a big car and don't mind doing a little fixing a couple of times a year. Said fixing isn't hard as parts are everywhere and the basic design is ancient.

The cars drive terribly and the steering is horrid. The rear seat room isn't great for a car of this size, either. However, were I driving from Saskatoon to Regina regularly I would buy one as a disposable appliance.
I'd never join a group that would have me as a member.

Offline chrischasescars

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Carma: +19/-31
  • Gender: Male
  • The Voice of Reason
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2012, 11:20:12 pm »
I rented one of these recently, while I was testing the Scion iQ. Interesting thing was that the Impala (this was a 2012 model) was not noticeably quieter on the highway, at least in terms of road/tire noise.
I used to work here.

Offline Solstice2006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 12681
  • Carma: +245/-468
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Hyundai Entourage, 2007 Buick Lucerne
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2015, 09:25:28 am »
Nice update.

So we getting any used reviews of the Mazda CX-9, Ford Flex, Volvo XC60 just to name a few..

Offline drive67

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 124
  • Carma: +4/-28
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Tacoma,Celica, HondaCRX, VW Scirocco,Ram,
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2015, 09:38:29 am »
The Chevrolet Impala was the car that finally made my sister say no more GMC's. She had so many problems that she knew the tow truck driver and the service people by name. Her Pontiac Bonneville caught on fire while driving and she still bought another GMC. Having a car you never knew would start or make it to a destination was to much for her. My brother in law still says they never had a problem with their cars.

Offline SXT

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Carma: +0/-3
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2015 Mazda 6
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2015, 10:59:52 pm »
The Chevrolet Impala was the car that finally made my sister say no more GMC's.

Me too, a piece of crap, engine cradle creaked, intake manifold leaks on the 3.8L using sawdust to block leaks approved by GM, transmission planetary gear, $3500 repair,  no more GM.  Car should have had little to no problems in the 55,000 km's I had that vehicle and I bought it new, so not a rental abused car.

Funny thing GM was known to build reliable transmission and the 3800 was a so called proven engine, so much for that.

Offline ArticSteve

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 27890
  • Carma: +310/-6817
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Hobby Car: 15 Mustang Vert, V6, manual, 3.55 lsd; 2024 MDX Aspec; 2022 F150 TREMOR lifted
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #10 on: December 10, 2015, 11:55:54 pm »
There were 5 decades of various GM 3.8 V6s.  Some where great and some were pure crap.  The units during the period of the GM bankruptcy were crap.  The brakes lasted 1/2 what they should have.  However, in the USA just prior to GM pulling them from the retail market ppl could purchase one new for $22K USD with the usual basics like AC/PW/PD, etc.  PPl also really liked the front split bench seat until they took that away.

Offline revalations

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 4006
  • Carma: +101/-330
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Chrysler Lebaron
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2015, 08:21:13 pm »
Mine is a 2005, I picked it up cheap after my Maxima got written off. I've had it two years with no problems. It's as exciting as plain oatmeal. but its comfy for highway use and gets amazingly good fuel economy.

Nice car to mile out without spending large, no worries about resale or costly repairs.

Offline hemusbull

  • Auto Obsessed
  • ***
  • Posts: 877
  • Carma: +15/-153
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2015, 09:30:45 pm »
Impala isn't quite different than many GM products. There is a very big percentage of them without more than minor problems. But a small percent are crap with few to several big and costly issues. This isn't just a reliability problem - it is a missing repeatability - one quality phenomenon GM should work vigorously to solve.

Offline SXT

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Carma: +0/-3
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2015 Mazda 6
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #13 on: December 13, 2015, 10:00:39 am »
There were 5 decades of various GM 3.8 V6s.  Some where great and some were pure crap.  The units during the period of the GM bankruptcy were crap.  The brakes lasted 1/2 what they should have.  However, in the USA just prior to GM pulling them from the retail market ppl could purchase one new for $22K USD with the usual basics like AC/PW/PD, etc.  PPl also really liked the front split bench seat until they took that away.

The 3800 Series I came before 1995 and Series II which I had was 95-03 and Series III after 2004.
Avoid the Series II as they switched from aluminium intake manifold to composite.

Most were crap as in B.C. they were used as taxi's and quickly disappeared.
Rare to see a 5-10 year old Impala in the lower mainland, I'm pretty sure it's because of reliability issues.
Still can see many Camry's, Civic's, Accord's etc that are 10-20 years old, for a good reason.

Offline SXT

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Carma: +0/-3
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2015 Mazda 6
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2015, 10:03:10 am »
Impala isn't quite different than many GM products. There is a very big percentage of them without more than minor problems. But a small percent are crap with few to several big and costly issues. This isn't just a reliability problem - it is a missing repeatability - one quality phenomenon GM should work vigorously to solve.

I respectfully disagree, look at consumer reports for 00-05 impala, solid black for transmission problems.
That means it's more than a small minority.

Offline Solstice2006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 12681
  • Carma: +245/-468
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Hyundai Entourage, 2007 Buick Lucerne
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #15 on: December 13, 2015, 10:38:34 am »
Impala isn't quite different than many GM products. There is a very big percentage of them without more than minor problems. But a small percent are crap with few to several big and costly issues. This isn't just a reliability problem - it is a missing repeatability - one quality phenomenon GM should work vigorously to solve.

I respectfully disagree, look at consumer reports for 00-05 impala, solid black for transmission problems.
That means it's more than a small minority.

Interesting, when I hear transmission issues, some vehicles come to mind.  I wouldn't think the GM sedans of that era would have those issues.  Can't think of anybody I know who has that problem.  Now intake manifold gasket with the 3.4L, 3.5L yes....

Offline paul246

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 231
  • Carma: +6/-21
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #16 on: December 14, 2015, 04:58:25 pm »
My next door neighbour has owned a series of these cars, always buys new, bitches about this and that and invariably comes home with a shiny new one every couple of years. I think GM's strategy is to get guys like him into the dealership with repairs as often as possible so they can interest him in the latest and greatest on the showroom floor. After all, it is common knowledge that the new one is much improved over the old one, is it not?

Offline SXT

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Carma: +0/-3
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2015 Mazda 6
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #17 on: December 15, 2015, 10:31:27 pm »
My next door neighbour has owned a series of these cars, always buys new, bitches about this and that and invariably comes home with a shiny new one every couple of years. I think GM's strategy is to get guys like him into the dealership with repairs as often as possible so they can interest him in the latest and greatest on the showroom floor. After all, it is common knowledge that the new one is much improved over the old one, is it not?

Not me, once I get burned with a bad choice that brand is forever off my list.

I expect a brand new car to be reliable (basic maintenance) for at least 7-8 years and 100K km's.

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 76339
  • Carma: +1255/-7217
    • View Profile
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #18 on: December 15, 2015, 10:38:30 pm »
^^Not asking too much IMO.
How fast is my 911?  Supras sh*t on on me all the time...in reverse..with blown turbos  :( ...

Offline Solstice2006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 12681
  • Carma: +245/-468
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2008 Hyundai Entourage, 2007 Buick Lucerne
Re: Used Vehicle Review: Chevrolet Impala, 2000-2012
« Reply #19 on: December 16, 2015, 08:09:52 am »
My next door neighbour has owned a series of these cars, always buys new, bitches about this and that and invariably comes home with a shiny new one every couple of years. I think GM's strategy is to get guys like him into the dealership with repairs as often as possible so they can interest him in the latest and greatest on the showroom floor. After all, it is common knowledge that the new one is much improved over the old one, is it not?

Not me, once I get burned with a bad choice that brand is forever off my list.

I expect a brand new car to be reliable (basic maintenance) for at least 7-8 years and 100K km's.

Have to disagree.  Even brands known for good reliability, can have things go wrong.  So if an alternator goes on a Honda Civic on it's 5th year of ownership at 75k, Honda is forever off your list?