Yup, here it is. It is an average over the whole run and different journalists drove different cars so it can't really be used as a direct head-to-head comparison
USA 2013 Escape EPA #
Horsepower, Torque & EPA-Estimated Fuel Economy
2.5L Duratec I-4 Engine Horsepower: 168 @ 6,000 rpm Torque (lb.-ft.): 170 @ 4,500 rpm
6-speed SelectShift Automatic
FWD 22 city/31 hwy/25 combined mpg
1.6L EcoBoost I-4 Engine Horsepower: 178 @ 5,700 rpm3 Torque: 184 @ 2,500 rpm3
6-speed SelectShift Automatic
FWD 23 city/33 hwy/26 combined mpg
4WD 22 city/30 hwy/25 combined mpg You wrote you seen mediocre # 7.9l/100km which =Imperial 36MPG (US gals 30MPG). Why do you feel this is mediocre for a AWD 178hp CUV vehicle? I assume your 7.9L was overall average yes/no?
What AWD CUV in this class with same HP exceeds your findings compared with the 2013 Escape? Or maybe the better question would
be , what type of fuel efficiency numbers would you consider not to be mediocre in the class with same 178hp & AWD?
2.0L EcoBoost I-4 Engine Horsepower: 240 @ 5,500 rpm3 Torque: 270 @ 3,000 rpm3
6-speed SelectShift Automatic
FWD 22 city/30 hwy/25 combined mpg
4WD 21 city/28 hwy/24 combined mpg