I think the idea is that they are erring on the side of fuel economy rather than power. I like that aspect. Though I would wait for a diesel.
Libraman, I completely agree. It's not always about being the fastest in the class. The review mentions it is a fast as the current CR-V, not the new one. Well Honda seemed to sell enough CR-V's without the V6. So power shouldn't be the major issue, for this segment. More torque will come with the upcoming diesel, which hopefully would allow it to tow at least 2500lbs.
I also like Mazda's approach to the interior, having 3 fabric choices. Not very common in this segment, tired of looking in the cars, and seeing all black. I see some two-tone in the pics, which breaks things up nicely.
I would rather spend $25k on a vehicle with this kind of conservative styling, with the option of diesel, manual, and AWD, may not available together, but for the vast majority, with good fuel economy, rather than spending more money for a V6, and more money for gas.
Slowly, but surely, car manufacturers are starting to put fuel economy as a major priority, especially Ford. I have a feeling the HP & torque wars with the truck commercials will start changing to fuel economy wars, the V6 in the Ford F150 is selling more than the V8!
Nice to Mazda doing something slightly different!