You know, most places I've heard from about this issue have tended to go against the CRTC's decision and against the exorbitant charges put in place by the big internet providers, except in one newspaper. That newspaper is the Journal de Montréal, which has ignored the ruling except in an editorial that supported the CRTC's decision and whined about the hysterical people who spoke out against it. Curious... until you realize that the Journal de Montréal is owned by Quebecor, which also owns Videotron, the main cable internet provider in Québec. It's fun when big companies use their media as mouthpieces to defend their own interests, right?
That being said, an example of how Videotron is using absurd fees. Let's imagine two friends like in an apartment, both have a computer and are big internet users. They use Videotron's 15 Mbps service, at 56 $ per month, a 70-gig download cap and a 1,50 $ fee for every additional gig downloaded, no limit on these additional fees (even Bell is better, it caps those fees at 60 $, at least up to 300 gigs).
Anyway, let's say they both use 70 gigs, for a total of 140 gigs, 70 over the limit. The total bill comes to 161 $ per month.
Now let's say instead that each one had a different line (not sure if it's possible in an apartment but no matter) with the same plan. They both would have 15 Mbps for a combined maximum speed of 30 Mbps. But since their own personal use of the internet do not go above the cap, they pay only the base price, 56 $ each, for a total of 112 $.
Notice the problem here? Having two lines instead of one results in a lower cost, but this option is actually WORSE for the network. If you really cared about the bandwidth and not just, you know, inflating bills, you should encourage these people to share one line, because that way in peak hours they'd still use only a maximum of 15 Mbps instead of up to 30 Mbps. There is no logic.