I'm sure it is fine, I was tossing it around at about 120-130km/h in a slalom. At regular driving speeds you would never know.
Funny about that. The 1st model year of the Gen II CRX was 1988. Its rear suspension had a certain amount of passive steer built into it. The automobile magazines (ie: enthusiasts!) loved it, since it dialed out a lot of the understeer that was/is so common in front drive vehicles. Apparently JQ Public didn't like it. In subsequent model years (89, 90, 91) they dialed out that characteristic and used the opportunity to change the rear suspension geometry subtley in other ways by putting the rear dampers' mount location outside of the lower transverse members vs. inside as they were with the 1988. They also changed the the transverse members to a nice, slim forged piece from the simple stamped steel that it was in the '88 and massaged the spring rates a bit, too.
I think maybe I should drive one before saying I don't like it. James, I know that you're an enthusiast so your opinion goes a long way. After all, it's not how fast you go, it's how well you go fast! (I think that was a VW advertising slogan in the early 1990s. Probably a GTI commerical)
