Author Topic: CD Article: 2010 Cadillac SRX (Read 9736 times)

Autos_Editor · « **on:** September 16, 2009, 05:06:18 am »

First Drive:

The new SRX is so completely new that it is difficult to compare it to the outgoing model, say Managing Editor, Grant Yoxon. Now front-wheel drive with optional AWD, the 2010 SRX offers two smaller V6 engines with better fuel economy.
More: View the photos | All the First Drives

Honda Owner · « **Reply #1 on:** September 16, 2009, 11:02:34 am »

What is the trend towards pointy noses and squashed rear ends? Seems all these SUVs are trying to mimic the BMW X6, which is about the most hideous car on the market. But then again, BMW sells a lot of them at absurd prices so I assume they are doing something right and the others are equally correct in following them.

The car seems overweight, underpowered and and a classic example of GM badge engineering. I doubt many Cadillac buyers want at 5100 RPM torque peak. Can't see it taking it too many RX customers but time will tell.

ktm525 · « **Reply #2 on:** September 16, 2009, 11:08:31 am »

Horrible. Cadillac takes a proper N/S engine config that is RWD biased and replaces it with a torqueless, transverse minivan with no cargo carrying ability. I'll take the previous generation with the V8 and all the goodies. A 2 year old creampuff should have almost depreciated by half.

Ontariodriver · « **Reply #3 on:** September 16, 2009, 11:34:09 am »

Up to their old tricks again. You would thought they would have learned.

DockMan · « **Reply #4 on:** September 16, 2009, 12:03:25 pm »

Is this car worth the premium over it's chev and GMC variants? Seems to have taken all the great bits out of the former SRX (which was awesome to drive, I had a V8 version) and dumbed down and homogenized it to the point where no one will want this thing. The old SRX was unique and worth the premium, the new SRX IMHO is simply another "me-too" mid-sized semi-luxury SUV in a very crowded market.

wing · « **Reply #5 on:** September 16, 2009, 10:06:18 pm »

So ...
Acadia / Traverse / Enclave and SRX now? Did I miss any?

Hmmmm Grant isn't sure if it is a clone, can anyone confirm / deny?

Ex-airbalancer · « **Reply #6 on:** September 16, 2009, 10:45:28 pm »

I do not think you got any right

The SRX is based on GM's Theta Premium platform -- an enhanced version of the regular Theta architecture, which forms the basis for the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox and 2010 GMC Terrain.

rrocket · « **Reply #7 on:** September 16, 2009, 10:56:54 pm »

Quote from: airbalancer on September 16, 2009, 10:45:28 pm

I do not think you got any right

The SRX is based on GM's Theta Premium platform -- an enhanced version of the regular Theta architecture, which forms the basis for the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox and 2010 GMC Terrain.

Used for the Saturn VUE IIRC....

G0dspd · « **Reply #8 on:** September 16, 2009, 11:28:54 pm »

"GM is preparing a premium version of Theta. Reports differ, but the general consensus is that it is a combination of the current Theta and elements of the new Epsilon 2 architecture, with some Lambda components as well. So far, the only models are the Saab 9-4X and Cadillac SRX. Despite the fact that these vehicles are loosely based on Theta, which is often used for small CUVs, it is believed that these will actually be midsized, since many have predicted that the 9-4X replace the similarly sized Saab 9-7X. There are also rumors of 7-seater TE (Theta-Epsilon) models under development."

I was under the impression that the Saturn VUE was to be ~~recycled~~ re-engineered for Buick but it seems they're using the Delta platform instead.

Ex-airbalancer · « **Reply #9 on:** September 17, 2009, 06:11:33 am »

Quote from: rrocket on September 16, 2009, 10:56:54 pm

Quote from: airbalancer on September 16, 2009, 10:45:28 pm
I do not think you got any right

The SRX is based on GM's Theta Premium platform -- an enhanced version of the regular Theta architecture, which forms the basis for the 2010 Chevrolet Equinox and 2010 GMC Terrain.

Used for the Saturn VUE IIRC....

Was going to put the VUE, but no point about talking about the dead

wing · « **Reply #10 on:** September 17, 2009, 07:34:21 am »

So it's smaller? Wow sounds like FAIL.

DockMan · « **Reply #11 on:** September 17, 2009, 07:40:41 am »

Quote from: wing on September 17, 2009, 07:34:21 am

So it's smaller? Wow sounds like FAIL.

Yes Smaller, Agree....FAIL!
Really disappointed in GM for that one.

Iso Octane · « **Reply #12 on:** September 17, 2009, 11:36:14 pm »

Quote from: ktm525 on September 16, 2009, 11:08:31 am

Horrible. Cadillac takes a proper N/S engine config that is RWD biased and replaces it with a torqueless, transverse minivan with no cargo carrying ability.

You guys notice what they did there? They blacked out a foot of body work all around the bottom of the car to make it look like it has more ground clearance (and hence more SUV like).

That is so so lame!

sailor723 · « **Reply #13 on:** September 18, 2009, 03:46:19 am »

I have to agree that I'm not impressed either. I don't like the rear end at all and the 3.0 base engine seems pretty anemic. I mean, 223 ft-lbs of torque and a 4000 lb+ vehicle that may often be loaded with 700- 1000 lbs of people and gear while on a road trip is not a recipe for a enjoyable driving experience.

Ex-airbalancer · « **Reply #14 on:** September 18, 2009, 06:52:35 am »

Quote from: Mattesa on September 17, 2009, 11:36:14 pm

Quote from: ktm525 on September 16, 2009, 11:08:31 am
Horrible. Cadillac takes a proper N/S engine config that is RWD biased and replaces it with a torqueless, transverse minivan with no cargo carrying ability.

You guys notice what they did there? They blacked out a foot of body work all around the bottom of the car to make it look like it has more ground clearance (and hence more SUV like).

That is so so lame!

Or with a black out body work show less stone chips

DockMan · « **Reply #15 on:** September 18, 2009, 07:43:42 am »

My wife would say it looks good and has all the features she would want

I guess maybe that is the target market. SRX driving soccer Mom's

It doesn't look bad.....I'm just disappointed that they took a great car and turned it bland. May wife on the other had couldn't care less. Is this vehicle more marketable than the version it replaces?

Ex-airbalancer · « **Reply #16 on:** September 18, 2009, 07:49:42 am »

Quote from: DockMan on September 18, 2009, 07:43:42 am

My wife would say it looks good and has all the features she would want

I guess maybe that is the target market. SRX driving soccer Mom's

It doesn't look bad.....I'm just disappointed that they took a great car and turned it bland. May wife on the other had couldn't care less. Is this vehicle more marketable than the version it replaces?

I guess the problem is if you are only selling 20 a month in Canada of the old style,
Why would you keep it around.
They probably should call it something else, so it would not get compared with the old SRX

inco · « **Reply #17 on:** September 18, 2009, 07:55:51 am »

Somebody going into a Cadillac house is going to be faced with a dilemma. SRX or CTS wagon, which has a lot of the same features I think. And the price isn't that much different either.

Too confusing perhaps?

safristi · « **Reply #18 on:** September 18, 2009, 07:56:50 am »

lovely theta meter maid.....................not...........a LOW TORQUE CADDY..wot were they NOT SMOKIN'...........answer the TYRES.................

wing · « **Reply #19 on:** September 18, 2009, 09:54:49 am »

They will go for the SUV because SUVs are cool

Author Topic: CD Article: 2010 Cadillac SRX (Read 9736 times)

Honda Owner