Author Topic: Real-world fuel consumption  (Read 1000856 times)

Offline Ex-airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 40151
  • Carma: +729/-1584
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Silverado 1500 LTZ ext ended cab , 2013 Lexus RX-350 F Sport
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3420 on: June 02, 2019, 01:05:41 pm »
14.58l/100 in the truck on the last tank - not bad, I guess.  Not great.  Or just over 16 mpg US or just over 19 Imperial mpgs for anyone as old as AB...no wait...he's full on metric guy.   :P ;D  Hey AB!  I started with l/100!!
About time , were you even born when Canada switch to metic?  ??? ;D

Offline dkaz

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13967
  • Carma: +289/-389
  • Gender: Male
  • Flip flop
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 12 Mazda 5 GT 6MT
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3421 on: June 02, 2019, 01:20:33 pm »
Do people still buy gas by the imperial gallon in Canada? Totally irrelevant unit.

Offline blur911

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13708
  • Carma: +244/-779
  • Nasty Weasel
    • View Profile
  • Cars: and bikes by age:Honda, BMW, Porsche, Subaru, Suzuki, Suzuki, Mazda, Jaguar, Kawasaki, Porsche, GMC, Suzuki
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3422 on: June 02, 2019, 01:56:41 pm »
Do people still buy gas by the imperial gallon in Canada? Totally irrelevant unit.

How do you measure miles?  ;D


BTW, my last tank in the Cayenne S was 14.8 l/100km
Mr Pickypants

Offline dkaz

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13967
  • Carma: +289/-389
  • Gender: Male
  • Flip flop
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 12 Mazda 5 GT 6MT
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3423 on: June 02, 2019, 02:29:23 pm »
I adapt to miles in the US, and buy gas there by the US gallon, so I go by miles per US gallon. In Canada, we buy gas by the litre and use metres and kilometres for distance.

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33318
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3424 on: June 02, 2019, 02:35:36 pm »
^^^  That's pretty good for that SUV!

Other than my height and weight I am clueless about non-metric anything.  All these friggin cups and teaspoons and crap, omg, I've converted my most used recipes to milliliters.  Then I can scale them easily as I often cook for varying group sizes.

We occasionally come across US climbers and they are talking in feet and miles and everyone just stares blankly. "What's the elevation of the ridge?"  2500 meters. "What's that in feet?"  No clue, don't care.

You can tell Americans that have traveled a lot. They're usually fully metric. Same for ex military.

Offline mlin32

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Carma: +65/-419
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 Peugeot 308 GT; 2015 Yamaha YZF-R3
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3425 on: June 02, 2019, 05:14:22 pm »
Week-end to/return to Strasbourg. Not too bad considering the use of air con (summer arrived lol) and the usual full boot of stuff on the way home, plus a lot of urban driving.

Today, it got so hot during midday that I just shut off the Start&Stop system (it shuts off above 35° anyway) cuz the cabin would heat up so quickly that the motor would restart to keep the cabine cool.
ø cons: Peugeot 308: Yamaha R3 [/URL]

Offline random006

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8306
  • Carma: +123/-83
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: His - 2018 Subaru Crosstrek .... Hers - 2008 Honda Civic DX
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3426 on: June 03, 2019, 01:14:17 pm »
Filled up on Sunday.  I reset my main trip counter as is my habit and was greeted with the following totally improbable total distance projection.   It was actually even bigger (930) just after filling but was down to what you see in the photo in just a few minutes.

It’s nice to know that even car trip computers can dream big.   :rofl2:




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass...and I'm all out of bubblegum.    -    John Nada (played by Roddy Piper) in "They Live"

Offline EV-Light

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8141
  • Carma: +125/-1490
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3427 on: June 03, 2019, 02:43:40 pm »
F150 mpg on my way from Kenora...this past weekend:


Offline Great_Big_Abyss

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13870
  • Carma: +269/-457
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2019 Mazda CX-5
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3428 on: June 03, 2019, 03:01:36 pm »
^^^ That's pretty good.  I'm starting to see 13-14L/100kms on highway stints, now, which is about what the Tundra should be getting. 

Offline EV-Light

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8141
  • Carma: +125/-1490
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3429 on: June 03, 2019, 04:56:30 pm »
^^^ That's pretty good.  I'm starting to see 13-14L/100kms on highway stints, now, which is about what the Tundra should be getting.

Yup, I expect to see 9s when the engine breaks in.....we will see in a couple thousand kms.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline me_2

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 3601
  • Carma: +300/-76
  • Gender: Male
  • 2014 Volt, 2001 Saturn SW2. Son's DD: 2015 Volt
    • View Profile
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3430 on: June 03, 2019, 07:45:32 pm »
Driven 458 km yesterday, mostly highway. It was raining outgoing but dry on my way back home

10.8kWh / 56.7km => 19kWh /100km + once battery depleted, 23.38L / 401.5km => 5.83L/100k
Gone but not forgotten in chronological order: 2019 Volt, 2013 Volt, 2014 Spark EV, 2012 Volt and many others before...

Offline dkaz

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13967
  • Carma: +289/-389
  • Gender: Male
  • Flip flop
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 12 Mazda 5 GT 6MT
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3431 on: June 03, 2019, 08:03:23 pm »
That’s amazing. TFL Truck did a towing comparison between the 2.7L EcoBoost and 5.0 V8 and found the V8 got better MPGs, 9.8 vs. 8.7 towing a 7,000 lb trailer. Did you get the 2.7 or 3.5?

For day to day driving though, the EcoBoost seems to win.

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33318
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3432 on: June 03, 2019, 08:18:04 pm »
Under heavy loads, the turbo engine sucks gas  like any V-8.  I know a few EcoBoost owners that tow a lot and they haven't realized much over a V-8 in overall economy.

Offline Blueprint

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 10321
  • Carma: +170/-233
  • Gender: Male
  • member since way back when
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2024 Mazda CX-90 GS-L PHEV, 2022 Subaru Crosstrek Limited, 1975 Triumph TR6
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3433 on: June 03, 2019, 08:52:19 pm »
Just finished a typical mixed urban driving week with a 2019 Charger SXT awd (awd = V6). Impressed by the 11.2 result, so much better than anything SUV with a similar mill.
Traffic engineer/project manager & part time auto journalist

Offline EV-Light

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8141
  • Carma: +125/-1490
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3434 on: June 03, 2019, 09:38:40 pm »
That’s amazing. TFL Truck did a towing comparison between the 2.7L EcoBoost and 5.0 V8 and found the V8 got better MPGs, 9.8 vs. 8.7 towing a 7,000 lb trailer. Did you get the 2.7 or 3.5?

For day to day driving though, the EcoBoost seems to win.

I have the 3.5...and yup, under load the Ecoboost is a wash - I saw that review and they also said the V8 ‘felt the load’ vs the 2.7L felt like the 7k lbs were like peanuts.

This truck is a performance machine on a straight line, I am shocked at how fast you can get to 100 given its sheer size and weight.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Bubba

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 19143
  • Carma: +382/-442
  • Gender: Male
  • Vice President, Autos.ca Arizona Operations
    • View Profile
    • My photo site
  • Cars: 2013 Toyota Corolla LE
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3435 on: June 03, 2019, 09:48:49 pm »
Last tank on the Sonata.  561 km, with 125 of that on the highway, 9.2L/100 km.
My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson


Offline bye

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2616
  • Carma: +315/-525
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3436 on: June 04, 2019, 06:15:51 pm »
2013 Tesla Model S 85 at 130,000 km.
Lifetime 22 kWh / 100 km at electricity price of 13c / kWh (all fees included) = $2.86 / 100 km
= equivalent 2.4 L / 100 km.

2018 Smart ED at 15000 km
Lifetime 17 kWh / 100 km at electricity price of 13c / kWh (all fees included) = $2.21 / 100 km
= equivalent 1.9 L / 100 km.

Notes : Previous Smart ED over 40000 km was similar efficiency.
Am a lead foot.  No "ECO" driving.

Offline BWII

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6201
  • Carma: +188/-376
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3437 on: June 05, 2019, 09:12:25 am »
F150.  105-110 kmh.  One hell of a tailwind...what do you call that?  A qualifier? 
I should've kept driving south, wonder how far I could've gotten.  ;D

Offline Ex-airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 40151
  • Carma: +729/-1584
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Silverado 1500 LTZ ext ended cab , 2013 Lexus RX-350 F Sport
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3438 on: June 05, 2019, 11:26:12 am »
F150.  105-110 kmh.  One hell of a tailwind...what do you call that?  A qualifier? 
I should've kept driving south, wonder how far I could've gotten.  ;D
Are you allowed in ND  ???  :P  :rofl2:

Offline BWII

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6201
  • Carma: +188/-376
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Real-world fuel consumption
« Reply #3439 on: June 05, 2019, 11:51:40 am »
They let me in, but they don't love me enough to take out the rubber gloves and check me for "colon cancer".  So...good thing I guess?  Unless they find that kind of thing fun... :P


 ;D