...Both the Z06 and 911 circulated in the 2:02 range. The GT-R? 1:57 !!!
Well if you haven't found out already, various sources (both private parties and magazines) have confirmed that Nissan is (grossly) underrating the engine's hp. R35 GT-R is typically dyno'd at about 480hp at the wheels, and a conservative guess of 10% drivetrain loss puts the actually hp at the flywheel at ~530hp. So as advanced as the car's AWD system is, the reason GT-R is faster than 911tt is simply that it's making much more hp than advertised. No amount of engineering can overcome laws of physics and make car "A" that's significantly heavier than car "B" with equal power to go that much faster.
You're being very conservative with your 10% drivetrain loss on an AWD car. I would guessetmiate closer to 20%
Has anybody seen the results from the AMUSE tuner for the GT-R. They got 612 HP from intake, exhaust and ECU.
I was skeptical about this car when it was announced and launched. But now I'm a firm believer of it's performance. I'm still not a fan of AWD and the heavy weight. But you can't deny the performance anymore.
As impressive as the spec-V time at the 'Ring. Those times are very misleading. How do we know the Carrera GT didn't run into traffic or it was damp that day, etc... So many variables at the 'Ring.