To me AWD has its uses in snow, ice, and bad wet weather. On a dry track or road, it makes you wonder if it's worth while. I mean, F1 cars are not AWD.
But neither are they FWD.
I was just pointing out that the professionals who design, race and manage one of the most rigorous races known to man do not feel AWD is necessary or worthwhile, that's all. Obviously F1 cars are a completely different beast.
Cannot compare the EVO with the MS3. Not in the same class. At best the MS3 likens to the Neon SRT4, Caliber SRT4,Civic SI and GTI. All fairly capable FWD cars in its own class. EVO and STi are another beast altogether.
RWD --> AWD -----------------------------------------------------------> FWD. Grin
I wasn't necessarily trying to compare MS3 with EVO X as overall packages. I know the EVO X is in a different league. It was more a question of how useful is AWD on the racetrack. And let's face it, these cars (EVO X, STi) are really only gonna stretch their legs on a racetrack anyway. The question of traction off the line was introduced and I stated my opinion.
The EVO and STi come from rally heritage where AWD is important. I can't think of a single person who is going to buy a $45,000 dollar car, then blast down a gravel, muddy road--unless they are a sponored rally team.
As for overall vehicle driving feel and fun factor, I'd rather have RWD only.
Wish the MS3 was $29,995 with an AWD version for $31,995.
With some clever deal making you can get the MS3 for $30k. That's not much lower than the msrp.
