Author Topic: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible  (Read 12188 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« on: October 16, 2007, 10:39:45 pm »
Today's Test Drive:
2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible

2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertibleHardtop convertible: Lovely styling, good performance and a marvelously-engineered roof all come together in the Volvo C70, says Assistant Editor Jil McIntosh. Handling is sharp and it's fun to drive, but it's expensive, she says.
   
   More...


Read the article | View the photos | All The Test Drives


Mitlov

  • Guest
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2007, 11:36:57 pm »
Good looking car.  Thing is, I don't see a single advantage of the C70 over the Eos, which is about 2/3s the price ($37,100 base price versus $56,500 base price).

Offline 2JDM

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7161
  • Carma: +119/-141
  • Gender: Male
  • member
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2007, 01:31:15 am »
I think I have seen like 3 of these models on the road. I am assuming its very rare because of the price tag.  :o

Mitlov

  • Guest
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2007, 01:40:19 am »
I think I have seen like 3 of these models on the road. I am assuming its very rare because of the price tag.  :o

I've seen a few Eos's, but no C70s.  In the States, the price gap is narrower (the Eos is 80% of the price of the C70, not 66%).  The C70 is just plain overpriced for what it offers.

Eric Green

  • Guest
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2007, 08:30:19 am »
For 65-large, it better have RWD. This is one overpriced hairdresser's car (think Solara and Sebring and G6 convertibles).

Offline sirAQUAMAN64

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13396
  • Carma: +8/-54
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2001 VW Golf TDI 3Dr 5MT, 2007 VW Golf GTI 6MT, 2008 Saturn Astra XR 5Dr 4AT, 2010 VW Golf Wagon TDI 6MT, 2014 Chevrolet Orlando 2LT
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2007, 11:49:23 am »
I think it's a gorgeous vehicle, much better proportioned than the Eos. And they have great option selection, think even the Dynaudio. Can actually seat 4 fairly comfortably too.

But I can't ignore the Eos's value, or it's built-in glass sunroof which is brilliant. The usable front seat space is better in Eos as well.

Neither should go thru an automated car wash.
AQUAMAN64 also posts on DriverBlogs.com!

Offline The Mighty Duck

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7861
  • Carma: +34/-44
  • Gender: Male
  • f*** that duck
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2010 MINI Cooper S | Past: 1999 Honda Civic, 2009 Honda Fit
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2007, 12:30:34 pm »
Good looking car.  Thing is, I don't see a single advantage of the C70 over the Eos, which is about 2/3s the price ($37,100 base price versus $56,500 base price).

I agree.  Lovely car, but there's much better out there for nearly $60 000.

Offline sailor723

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15654
  • Carma: +417/-1000
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '17 BMW X5 Xdrive35i, '11 BMW 328iXdrive,
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2007, 01:50:48 pm »
Good looking car.  Thing is, I don't see a single advantage of the C70 over the Eos, which is about 2/3s the price ($37,100 base price versus $56,500 base price).

I agree.  Lovely car, but there's much better out there for nearly $60 000.

I guess I'm with the majority on this one. It's a beautiful car but when the price is factored in there are better options
Old Jag convertible...one itch I won't have to scratch again.

Offline Schmengie

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Carma: +27/-26
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2007, 02:46:25 pm »
 With Volvo's dismal reliability ratings lately, who in their right mind would spend (Gasp!! :o) almost $60,000 on one of these things, as nice as they are? I can just see a C70 at a traffic light with the roof stuck half-way.  ::) ;D
' Saw an Alfalfa Romeeo go by - furrin sports car forty feet long, mebbe nine inches high.' - Charlie Farquharson

Offline Ex-airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 40151
  • Carma: +729/-1584
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Silverado 1500 LTZ ext ended cab , 2013 Lexus RX-350 F Sport
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2007, 02:47:25 pm »
I really can't say I have seen one on the road, but I have seen alot of new 328cic.
Have not seen many Eos either.
It is a nice looking car

Offline mmret

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 14603
  • Carma: +240/-570
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2007, 02:56:12 pm »
Good looking car.  Thing is, I don't see a single advantage of the C70 over the Eos, which is about 2/3s the price ($37,100 base price versus $56,500 base price).

Agreed, Eos is quite nice.
You can't just have your characters announce how they feel.
That makes me feel angry!

Present: 15.5 V60 T6 + Polestar, 17 MDX
Sometimes Borrow: 11 GLK350
Dark and Twisted Past: 13 TL AWD, 07 Z4 3.0si, 07 CLK550, 06 TSX, 07 Civic, 01 Grandma!

Offline tortoise

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15077
  • Carma: +236/-453
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2007, 03:15:23 pm »
I'll take a Miata and an S40 for the same price please Alex.
Only the slow and dim know where they're going in life, and seldom is it worth the trip. - Tom Robbins.

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 38392
  • Carma: +702/-1347
  • Gender: Male
  • “It’s never crowded along the extra mile.”
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD.2004 Honda S2000 Bikes: Giant Defy Avdvanced 0. Giant Talon 29 "hardtail"
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2007, 03:20:29 pm »
With Volvo's dismal reliability ratings lately, who in their right mind would spend (Gasp!! :o) almost $60,000 on one of these things, as nice as they are? I can just see a C70 at a traffic light with the roof stuck half-way.  ::) ;D

 ??? Volvo has a higher reliability rating than Nissan.

Mitlov

  • Guest
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2007, 03:23:16 pm »
??? Volvo has a higher reliability rating than Nissan.

It all depends on which model you're talking about.  The S60 is the most reliable European car out there, according to CR, but the S40 has been plagued with problems.  The second-generation C70 is based on the S40, despite the name.

Likewise, Nissan has some very reliable vehicles (Frontier), some very unreliable vehicles (Titan), and plenty in between.  Nissan doesn't offer something comparable to the C70, so we can't talk about a specific model.

Offline Schmengie

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Carma: +27/-26
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2007, 03:44:37 pm »
??? Volvo has a higher reliability rating than Nissan.

It all depends on which model you're talking about.  The S60 is the most reliable European car out there, according to CR, but the S40 has been plagued with problems.  The second-generation C70 is based on the S40, despite the name.

Likewise, Nissan has some very reliable vehicles (Frontier), some very unreliable vehicles (Titan), and plenty in between.  Nissan doesn't offer something comparable to the C70, so we can't talk about a specific model.

 :iagree: :iagree: Not only that, but doesn't spending $60,000 on a Volvo C70 entitle you to expect more reliability (or anything for that matter) than spending, say, $18,000 on a Nissan Versa? I dunno, I just thought I'd ask.... ;D

Offline Ex-airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 40151
  • Carma: +729/-1584
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Silverado 1500 LTZ ext ended cab , 2013 Lexus RX-350 F Sport
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #15 on: October 17, 2007, 03:46:41 pm »
no, you have the same reliability at any cost

Offline Snowman

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 38392
  • Carma: +702/-1347
  • Gender: Male
  • “It’s never crowded along the extra mile.”
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Cars: 2012 Audi TT-RS. 2011 Toyota Venza AWD.2004 Honda S2000 Bikes: Giant Defy Avdvanced 0. Giant Talon 29 "hardtail"
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #16 on: October 17, 2007, 03:55:28 pm »
no, you have the same reliability at any cost

Exactly, reliability is not a function of MSRP.

Mitlov

  • Guest
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #17 on: October 17, 2007, 03:56:22 pm »
Not only that, but doesn't spending $60,000 on a Volvo C70 entitle you to expect more reliability (or anything for that matter) than spending, say, $18,000 on a Nissan Versa? I dunno, I just thought I'd ask.... ;D

No.  Reliability never increases as prices do.  A four-banger Accord is more reliable than an Acura RL, if I recall correctly.  Greater prices mean more mechanical complexity and greater drivetrain stresses, which in turn mean less reliability.  The really reliable cars out there are very often econoboxes.  Corollas, Yarises, those sorts of things.  Your example of the Versais a great example.  Does a Versa have a folding hardtop that could break?  Is it turbocharged?  Does it have heated power seats?  All of these extras that make the C70 a nicer driving experience than a Versa are also potential reliability trouble spots.

Offline Ex-airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 40151
  • Carma: +729/-1584
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Silverado 1500 LTZ ext ended cab , 2013 Lexus RX-350 F Sport
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #18 on: October 17, 2007, 04:22:18 pm »
If you take out the little problems I have had with the folding roof 323CIC, the car has almost been prefect

Offline Schmengie

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Carma: +27/-26
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: 2007 Volvo C70 hardtop convertible
« Reply #19 on: October 17, 2007, 04:25:42 pm »
Not only that, but doesn't spending $60,000 on a Volvo C70 entitle you to expect more reliability (or anything for that matter) than spending, say, $18,000 on a Nissan Versa? I dunno, I just thought I'd ask.... ;D

No.  Reliability never increases as prices do.  A four-banger Accord is more reliable than an Acura RL, if I recall correctly.  Greater prices mean more mechanical complexity and greater drivetrain stresses, which in turn mean less reliability.  The really reliable cars out there are very often econoboxes.  Corollas, Yarises, those sorts of things.  Your example of the Versais a great example.  Does a Versa have a folding hardtop that could break?  Is it turbocharged?  Does it have heated power seats?  All of these extras that make the C70 a nicer driving experience than a Versa are also potential reliability trouble spots.

Well, maybe so, but if I had that kind of money to spend on a car  :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:, I would be inclined to go for a Japanese brand like Lexus or Infinity for the very reason that I would expect better-than-average reliability for my money. Last time I checked, equivalent models from these manufacturers have the same if not more features than the C70.

PS - Years ago, my brother-in-law had a turbocharged Chrysler (I don't remember the model, but it was expensive) with power heated seats and all the options including a power sunroof, and had very few problems with it. Around the same time his Dad had a Horizon with no options at all and it broke so often I was afraid to drive it. Go figure.