« Reply #6 on: January 24, 2007, 09:57:50 am »
Wonderful car except for the two show stopping bullets:
· the steering wheel tries violently to escape your grip should either front wheel encounter any anomaly on the road's surface. Any little pothole, puddle or bit of dirt is like a landmine to the unleashed Speed3, and torque-steer really is class-leading.
· There is a trick limited slip differential up front, and the turbo output is limited in the first few gears to keep your rubber intact.
There is a logical reason why man invented RWD cars. Pushing a FWD car beyond 200-220 HP is not safe in the hands of the inexperienced. Having to retard the engine performance to counter torque steer and traction issues is just illogical IMHO. I am very surprised Mazda would not go the extra and provide the torque steering mechanism found in the MPS6.
If Mazda would have offered this car with a similar system found in the MPS6 the cost could have been $3k more and still be less than the WRX which is the only true competitor not mentioned in the article.
![I Agree :iagree:](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/iagree.gif)
100% Snowy. It's such a shame that Mazda didn't simply go the extra mile to incorporate the AWD system from the MS6. Why not? They've already got it there handy and they know it works well with the rest of the drivetrain. Seems like a no brainer -- even if they DID have to pump up the price $2-3000. Tsk tsk... so close, Mazda... but so far.
![](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Themes/ProRed2/images/ip.gif)
Logged
The past:00 BMW M Rdstr, 19 Jetta, 15 Ducati Scrambler, 09 Triumph Bonneville, 98 Boxster, 17 Kawi Z900, 05 LS 430, 99 LS 400, 17 Subaru STI, 14 Triumph STR, 15 WRX, 09 Ducati Monster 1100, 08 335i, 06 Suzuki SV650S, 06 330i, 06 MX-5, 04 Audi A4, 03 Suzuki SV650S, 98 328i, 93 Civic Si, 85 Corolla