Topic: The 2020 Toyota Camry and 2021 Avalon are getting AWD

[KD]

Why bother with the poor handling, gas mileage, looks, and size of a CUV to not have AWD??

why not buy the FWD version to save weight (better handling?), save money on purchase and possible repairs, get better gas mileage, get a higher seating position, make it easier to get in and out of and still get decent store space.

I'm with the mindset of if there is a bigger engine, get that, if there is awd, get that, if there is a better stereo, yes please, upgraded interior, foh shizzle. For the extra traction in the winter, the AWD is a no brainer.

So, why the hell aren't you driving a Wrangler Rubicon, then, instead of your plain jane Wrangler?  If that's really the theory to which you subscribe....

Wife bought it before I met her...I would have steered her towards a Sahara.

Was the V6 Stang hers as well?   

[Fobroader]

Why bother with the poor handling, gas mileage, looks, and size of a CUV to not have AWD??

why not buy the FWD version to save weight (better handling?), save money on purchase and possible repairs, get better gas mileage, get a higher seating position, make it easier to get in and out of and still get decent store space.

I'm with the mindset of if there is a bigger engine, get that, if there is awd, get that, if there is a better stereo, yes please, upgraded interior, foh shizzle. For the extra traction in the winter, the AWD is a no brainer.

So, why the hell aren't you driving a Wrangler Rubicon, then, instead of your plain jane Wrangler?  If that's really the theory to which you subscribe....

Wife bought it before I met her...I would have steered her towards a Sahara.

Was the V6 Stang hers as well?   

I just got a debadged GT as per Autos.com regulations. 

[Great_Big_Abyss]

Why bother with the poor handling, gas mileage, looks, and size of a CUV to not have AWD??

why not buy the FWD version to save weight (better handling?), save money on purchase and possible repairs, get better gas mileage, get a higher seating position, make it easier to get in and out of and still get decent store space.

I'm with the mindset of if there is a bigger engine, get that, if there is awd, get that, if there is a better stereo, yes please, upgraded interior, foh shizzle. For the extra traction in the winter, the AWD is a no brainer.

So, why the hell aren't you driving a Wrangler Rubicon, then, instead of your plain jane Wrangler?  If that's really the theory to which you subscribe....

Wife bought it before I met her...I would have steered her towards a Sahara.

Was the V6 Stang hers as well?   

I just got a debadged GT as per Autos.com regulations. 

You have redeemed yourself with that comment, sir!

[KD]

Why bother with the poor handling, gas mileage, looks, and size of a CUV to not have AWD??

why not buy the FWD version to save weight (better handling?), save money on purchase and possible repairs, get better gas mileage, get a higher seating position, make it easier to get in and out of and still get decent store space.

I'm with the mindset of if there is a bigger engine, get that, if there is awd, get that, if there is a better stereo, yes please, upgraded interior, foh shizzle. For the extra traction in the winter, the AWD is a no brainer.

So, why the hell aren't you driving a Wrangler Rubicon, then, instead of your plain jane Wrangler?  If that's really the theory to which you subscribe....

Wife bought it before I met her...I would have steered her towards a Sahara.

Was the V6 Stang hers as well?   

I just got a debadged GT as per Autos.com regulations. 

You have redeemed yourself with that comment, sir!

Yeah, good answer.