Author Topic: Quick Jack  (Read 8249 times)

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 76193
  • Carma: +1254/-7214
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2018, 05:12:35 pm »
I'm no expert on physics, but I would think that the weight of your car on the jack would make it pretty faking stable.  It'd take more than just leaning on one side to push the car off.

...my thoughts, at least.

Yep.
How fast is my 911?  Supras sh*t on on me all the time...in reverse..with blown turbos  :( ...

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35506
  • Carma: +1424/-2122
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2020 Toyota Tundra, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #21 on: April 17, 2018, 05:14:33 pm »
I'm no expert on physics, but I would think that the weight of your car on the jack would make it pretty faking stable.  It'd take more than just leaning on one side to push the car off.

...my thoughts, at least.

I've had a vehicle on 4 jackstands, its pretty freaking solid if done right. This thing would be even better, I would have no problem getting underneath.
Lighten up Francis.....

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 76193
  • Carma: +1254/-7214
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #22 on: April 17, 2018, 05:22:17 pm »
I'm no expert on physics, but I would think that the weight of your car on the jack would make it pretty faking stable.  It'd take more than just leaning on one side to push the car off.

...my thoughts, at least.

I've had a vehicle on 4 jackstands, its pretty freaking solid if done right. This thing would be even better, I would have no problem getting underneath.

Same.

I think many people here have never personally used a hoist or lift...so I understand some of the trepidation.

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35506
  • Carma: +1424/-2122
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2020 Toyota Tundra, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #23 on: April 17, 2018, 05:25:08 pm »
I'm no expert on physics, but I would think that the weight of your car on the jack would make it pretty faking stable.  It'd take more than just leaning on one side to push the car off.

...my thoughts, at least.

I've had a vehicle on 4 jackstands, its pretty freaking solid if done right. This thing would be even better, I would have no problem getting underneath.

Same.

I think many people here have never personally used a hoist or lift...so I understand some of the trepidation.

I've had a long box crew cab on a two post hoist....we chained that thing down like a mofo because that was sketchy AF. I guess yeah, if you've never been around them it might seem scary. That Contraption with the Suburban on it looks like something out of Final Destination, no spank you very much.

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33318
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #24 on: April 17, 2018, 08:27:44 pm »
when changing the Fozzie's brakes later in the summer.

I'm totally stoked about this future thread.

Offline tenpenny

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 9854
  • Carma: +137/-305
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #25 on: April 17, 2018, 08:30:57 pm »
I'm no expert on physics, but I would think that the weight of your car on the jack would make it pretty faking stable.  It'd take more than just leaning on one side to push the car off.

...my thoughts, at least.

I've had a vehicle on 4 jackstands, its pretty freaking solid if done right. This thing would be even better, I would have no problem getting underneath.

Same.

I think many people here have never personally used a hoist or lift...so I understand some of the trepidation.

I’m a mechanical engineer who has used hoists, lifts, jack stands, grease pits, etc etc, and I wouldn’t go near that thing.  You can have it.

I’ll take four independent jack stands over that thing any day of the week.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
My diesel car self-identifies as an electric vehicle.

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33318
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #26 on: April 17, 2018, 08:47:01 pm »

Offline tenpenny

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 9854
  • Carma: +137/-305
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #27 on: April 17, 2018, 09:17:42 pm »
^^^Why?

Safety and security.

The further apart the supports are, the more stable they are.  Look at the middle of that hoist, how far apart are they, compared to the length of the vehicle and it’s weight distribution?

Centre of gravity.  Physics.  Gut instinct.  Hydraulics.  Knowing how thick most concrete floors really are.  Safety factors.

You go ahead.  I’ll pass.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Offline Railton

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13713
  • Carma: +243/-156
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2017 Infiniti QX60 Touring, 2010 Infiniti G37S 6M, 2020 Hyundai Kona 1.6T Trend
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #28 on: April 17, 2018, 09:19:30 pm »
^^^Why?

Safety and security.

The further apart the supports are, the more stable they are.  Look at the middle of that hoist, how far apart are they, compared to the length of the vehicle and it’s weight distribution?

Centre of gravity.  Physics.  Gut instinct.  Hydraulics.  Knowing how thick most concrete floors really are.  Safety factors.

You go ahead.  I’ll pass.




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
^^Yup.
It would make for an interesting thread though.
Railton
Do you realize that in about 30 (updated as requested) years, we'll have millions of old ladies running around with tattoos?

Offline draghon

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1504
  • Carma: +20/-27
  • member
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Mine [07 Civic SI coupe] Wife [23 Sienna XSE AWD]
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #29 on: April 17, 2018, 09:25:44 pm »
The first link looks good to me, it lifts the car at the lift points and the base appears to sit directly below just like a jackstand would.

The second option looks bad, as you lift the car higher it looks like the base gets closer and closer together. Looks like a tip over waiting to happen.
ex rides: 93 Aerostar XLT AWD
wife ex rides: 07 Wave base, 11 Tiguan Comfortline with sport package, 14 Acadia SLE II AWD

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 76193
  • Carma: +1254/-7214
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #30 on: April 17, 2018, 09:34:00 pm »


I’m a mechanical engineer who has used hoists, lifts, jack stands, grease pits, etc etc, and I wouldn’t go near that thing.  You can have it.

I’ll take four independent jack stands over that thing any day of the week.



Hmmmm....Mechanical Engineers certified this and signed off on the Examination Certificate.  Are they full of it?

I saw this too just to   :stick:      :  http://www.quickjacklift.ca/why-quickjack/quickjack-is-more-stable-than-jack-stands/

I work around all this crazy heavy stuff too...and I'd have no problem using it.

I want to see someone pushing on this with a car on it....like actually trying to tip it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jvcVT-OxqvE

« Last Edit: April 17, 2018, 09:42:33 pm by rrocket »

Offline johngenx

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 33318
  • Carma: +758/-938
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2009 Toyota Corolla, 2004 Toyota Highlander V-6 4WD, 2001 Subaru Forester, 1994 Mazda Miata
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #31 on: April 17, 2018, 10:57:50 pm »
The locking mechanism looks bomber.

Offline bridgecity

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
  • Carma: +126/-182
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2014 MDX; 2007 Tundra
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #32 on: April 18, 2018, 01:21:42 am »
when changing the Fozzie's brakes later in the summer.

I'm totally stoked about this future thread.

100 pages deep before a wheel is off.
Quality is never an accident; it is always the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction, and skillful execution; it represents the wise choice of many alternatives.

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 76193
  • Carma: +1254/-7214
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #33 on: April 18, 2018, 01:25:29 am »


100 pages deep before a wheel is off.

 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

Offline runwhatyabrung

  • Enthusiast
  • **
  • Posts: 361
  • Carma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #34 on: April 18, 2018, 08:38:38 am »
My brother bought one a few weeks ago, he seems to like his. I have not had a chance to see it in action yet. I have a different model, EZcarlift, no hydraulics, basically 2 giant screw jacks
 

Offline Marko

  • Learner's Permit
  • *
  • Posts: 223
  • Carma: +1/-1
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #35 on: April 19, 2018, 11:59:59 am »
Why the heck are they so expensive though? Is it just cause they're new? I'd spend a few hundred on this but I'm not paying $2000.

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13575
  • Carma: +774/-2132
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '24 Crosstrek Wilderness
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #36 on: April 19, 2018, 01:25:35 pm »
^^ that was my concern.  It's sizable (harder for storage when not in use), and you have to buy it in 3 boxes (each of which were like $599...IIRC).

I think this is specifically for those who are otherwise considering a two-post lift.  Those who just want to do the occasional tire change need not consider same.

Offline rrocket

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 76193
  • Carma: +1254/-7214
    • View Profile
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #37 on: April 19, 2018, 02:38:43 pm »
^^ that was my concern.  It's sizable (harder for storage when not in use), and you have to buy it in 3 boxes (each of which were like $599...IIRC).

I think this is specifically for those who are otherwise considering a two-post lift.  Those who just want to do the occasional tire change need not consider same.
I didn't think it was bad at all. Saw one where he had the ramps vertical up against a wall...

Offline Fobroader

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 35506
  • Carma: +1424/-2122
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2020 Toyota Tundra, 2021 Lexus GX460, 2018 Kawasaki Versys X300
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #38 on: April 19, 2018, 03:02:10 pm »
^^ that was my concern.  It's sizable (harder for storage when not in use), and you have to buy it in 3 boxes (each of which were like $599...IIRC).

I think this is specifically for those who are otherwise considering a two-post lift.  Those who just want to do the occasional tire change need not consider same.
I didn't think it was bad at all. Saw one where he had the ramps vertical up against a wall...

I saw the same thing on the quick jacks, made a holder out of 2x4's attache to the wall, not a lot of room at all.

Offline Noto

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 13575
  • Carma: +774/-2132
  • This forum is making me almost as bitter as SirO
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '23 Mazda CX-50 Turbo; '24 Crosstrek Wilderness
Re: Quick Jack
« Reply #39 on: April 19, 2018, 03:33:19 pm »
Aren't the units rather heavy to move?  Not impossible, but not exactly featherweights...to lift it onto a wall...yikes.