I mean, I haven't, but a buddy of mine popped two tires trying to run me over once after I grabbed his gf's shoe and ran away with it in good fun. Thankfully, it was a Suzuki Swift 1.3 and I could outrun it (and defintely out-maneouver it) ![Grin ;D](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/grin.gif)
What?
In terms you'd understand (i.e. legal terms):
It is alleged that on ___ [date], [woman] did proceed to make a 'kicking'-like motion, which resulted in a piece of footwear being removed from her lower extremity and landing a short distance forward on the sidewalk ahead of the parties. At that time, No-san, the non-owner of said footwear, did retrieve the said piece with the intention to "tease" the [woman] by not returning it to her immediately. [Woman's] boyfriend, enraged, did enter his vehicle, a Suzuki Swift 1.3, and started the ignition. Shortly thereafter, he proceeded to return the said vehicle on the roadway into motion towards No-san, who remained on the sidewalk. It is alleged that in an attempt to put the vehicle in front of No-san, in an effort to stop his forward progress, the said driver did turn right sharply onto a driveway. At or about the same time, the two right-most wheels did contact the curb as a result of the said turn being made too sharply, which did cause an increase in pressure in the tires. We heard evidence from Tire Expert, rrocket, that the increased tire pressure was released explosively through the sidewalls of both tires, effectively blowing them out. Fortunately, the vehicle did not make contact with the said No-san, but the vehicle was disabled by virtue of the tire pressure extrication. The [woman's] shoe was returned without issue. Judgement in favour of Mr. No-san, and the said vehicle was towed to a location where new tires would be affixed at some later date and some cost that No-san is not responsible for.
![Grin ;D](https://www.autos.ca/forum/Smileys/CarTalk/grin.gif)
?