I for one miss the simple, inexpensive mobile-toolbox that was the previous Ford Ranger, often priced below 14k$ in basic trim. There were tons of these around here and they were right-sized and right-priced for many fleet operators.
Quote from: Blueprint on August 26, 2015, 12:09:25 pmI for one miss the simple, inexpensive mobile-toolbox that was the previous Ford Ranger, often priced below 14k$ in basic trim. There were tons of these around here and they were right-sized and right-priced for many fleet operators.That with a basic 4 banger, 4x4, a manual, vinyl floor and a 7-8' box and air conditioning would make a perfect round the house truck. I do not need power/heated/massaging console covers on my pickups
Quote from: Fobroader on August 26, 2015, 12:30:14 pmQuote from: Blueprint on August 26, 2015, 12:09:25 pmI for one miss the simple, inexpensive mobile-toolbox that was the previous Ford Ranger, often priced below 14k$ in basic trim. There were tons of these around here and they were right-sized and right-priced for many fleet operators.That with a basic 4 banger, 4x4, a manual, vinyl floor and a 7-8' box and air conditioning would make a perfect round the house truck. I do not need power/heated/massaging console covers on my pickupsI'll add to that requirement a decent quadcab with rear seats that can take childseats. I LOVED my Ranger and the equipment (or lack thereof) that it had. What ultimately made me get rid of it was its utter uselessness as a family vehicle.
This would be the 5th midsize truck not the 4th, you missed the Nissan Frontier, which will probably be redone in the next year or two.Bring this over only if you can offer a good diesel engine option. Otherwise it's rather pointless in my books.
You guys are dreaming. In terms of simplicity the best we can hope for are basic work truck editions. This is the era of feature wars in auto making and no place more so than trucks.