Author Topic: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007  (Read 14873 times)

Offline Autos_Editor

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 8326
  • Carma: +91/-560
  • member
    • View Profile
CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« on: April 23, 2008, 11:03:29 pm »


Used Vehicle Review:
Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007

Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007Though the Cadillac SRX crossover hasn't proven as reliable as the CTS sedan on which it is based, it's "about mid-pack in the luxury SUV field," says Contributing Editor, Chris Chase. "Brutal" depreciation means used examples are relatively cheap, he says.  

 
Read the article | View the photos | All The Used Vehicles

Offline ktm525

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
  • Carma: +117/-443
  • Just walk away!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Land Rover LR4, Honda Ridgeline, Husqvarna FE501
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2008, 12:10:04 pm »
V8, AWD, Magnaride shock absorbers make for a very entertaining drive. :thumbup:

Offline The Mighty Duck

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 7861
  • Carma: +34/-44
  • Gender: Male
  • f*** that duck
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2010 MINI Cooper S | Past: 1999 Honda Civic, 2009 Honda Fit
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2008, 12:29:20 pm »
I love the looks of the SRX...  this and the Murano are probably the most unique CUVs on the market.  I think I like the SRX a little better, though.  :)

The problems with the sunroof scare me a little, though...  shattering for no reason?   :-X

Offline ktm525

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
  • Carma: +117/-443
  • Just walk away!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Land Rover LR4, Honda Ridgeline, Husqvarna FE501
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2008, 01:16:38 pm »
Will the SRX be doomed with the arrival of the CTW? A CTS based wagon?

Offline sailor723

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15678
  • Carma: +417/-1000
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '17 BMW X5 Xdrive35i, '11 BMW 328iXdrive,
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2008, 08:10:08 pm »
I get the feeling it's on it's way out after 09. I don't think it ever had the sales GM hoped for. Kind of a shame really,I've had my 07 for a couple of months now and really like it so far. The interior fit and finish is at least as good as the RX350 I looked at and the handling is better.
Old Jag convertible...one itch I won't have to scratch again.

Offline jcon

  • Drunk on Fuel
  • ****
  • Posts: 1545
  • Carma: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2008, 09:10:22 pm »
I get the feeling it's on it's way out after 09. I don't think it ever had the sales GM hoped for. Kind of a shame really,I've had my 07 for a couple of months now and really like it so far. The interior fit and finish is at least as good as the RX350 I looked at and the handling is better.

How many times has the sunroof spontaneously combusted on you?  :stick: :-*

Offline sailor723

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15678
  • Carma: +417/-1000
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '17 BMW X5 Xdrive35i, '11 BMW 328iXdrive,
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2008, 05:01:44 am »
I get the feeling it's on it's way out after 09. I don't think it ever had the sales GM hoped for. Kind of a shame really,I've had my 07 for a couple of months now and really like it so far. The interior fit and finish is at least as good as the RX350 I looked at and the handling is better.

How many times has the sunroof spontaneously combusted on you?  :stick: :-*

So far so good....after two months I've even given up wearing the helmet and safety goggles. ;D

Offline Scaerio

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 11932
  • Carma: +193/-127
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2013 Volvo C30 T5; all my exes: 2005 Suzuki Aerio SE, '02 Renault Clio, '93 Volvo 850 GLT, '78 MB W-123 230
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2008, 09:37:21 am »
I think the SRX is the best looking of all of these luxury crossovers.
I'd rather be car-poor than house-poor...

Leviathan

  • Guest
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2008, 12:21:42 pm »
Saw one on the way to work yesterday and thought it was pretty nice looking.

baumer00

  • Guest
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2008, 12:33:46 pm »
I think it's good looking until you get the rear quarter, the back of this vehicle just looks so damn disjointed to me.

Offline ktm525

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
  • Carma: +117/-443
  • Just walk away!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Land Rover LR4, Honda Ridgeline, Husqvarna FE501
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2008, 12:58:19 pm »
I think it's good looking until you get the rear quarter, the back of this vehicle just looks so damn disjointed to me.

I agree. Nice face,  shame about the a$$.

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 46229
  • Carma: +471/-416
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: since the beginning of Saf timeLOTUS ELAN,STANDARD... 10, MG midget, MGB (2),Mazda Millennia,Hyundai Veloster and 1997 Ford Ranger 2014 Subaru Forester XT
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2008, 01:10:01 pm »
$60,000 NEW and $20K......at 3.5 year OLD !! man thats something......!!! ? but what. ???..a Bargoon or a fools paradise............ :think:..friend in the States has a second hand Escalade and is bummed at the "whole" experience...the SRX..is a tad behind the 8 ball on the "downsizing"...wot with gas in the USofA @ $3.59 fer their weenie GALLON :'(........... I imagine they would be a hoot with 4 golfing buddies onna Hi_Way trip south..but otherwise kinda expensive as a grocery getter..but wotta deal........DE-PREC-I+ATION is drivin me wild...next best thing to sliced Bison bits & Compound Interest..... ;D
Time is to stop everything happening at once

Offline Ex-airbalancer

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 40151
  • Carma: +729/-1584
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: 2011 Silverado 1500 LTZ ext ended cab , 2013 Lexus RX-350 F Sport
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2008, 01:47:17 pm »
$60,000 NEW and $20K......at 3.5 year OLD !! man thats something......!!! ? but what. ???..a Bargoon or a fools paradise............ :think:..friend in the States has a second hand Escalade and is bummed at the "whole" experience...the SRX..is a tad behind the 8 ball on the "downsizing"...wot with gas in the USofA @ $3.59 fer their weenie GALLON :'(........... I imagine they would be a hoot with 4 golfing buddies onna Hi_Way trip south..but otherwise kinda expensive as a grocery getter..but wotta deal........DE-PREC-I+ATION is drivin me wild...next best thing to sliced Bison bits & Compound Interest..... ;D

It has about the same mileage as any other SUV/CUV in the same class
I would look at one used but not new, GM does have a good warranty on it,
Also there is usually a Caddy dealer close by, not like the other luxuryury brands where it could be a couple hour drive for service

Offline Cord

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Carma: +104/-115
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2008, 02:11:59 pm »
Quote
$60,000 NEW and $20K......at 3.5 year OLD !!

I wouldn't get too excited by the depreciation figures in that article. Real life depreciation on any vehicle is never quite as bad as these reported red book figures. A quick search on Autotrader of 2004 SRXs showed that out of 42 available (outside of Ontario), only seven are priced at $19999 or less. And of course, a 2004 model could've been purchased in 2003 which could make it almost 5 years old.
"If we can just believe something then we don't have to really think for ourselves, do we?" Paul Haggis

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 46229
  • Carma: +471/-416
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: since the beginning of Saf timeLOTUS ELAN,STANDARD... 10, MG midget, MGB (2),Mazda Millennia,Hyundai Veloster and 1997 Ford Ranger 2014 Subaru Forester XT
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2008, 03:12:21 pm »
IT is the 2005's the article lists as $22K Now...$59K NEW......... ::) :P

Offline ktm525

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 16017
  • Carma: +117/-443
  • Just walk away!
    • View Profile
  • Cars: Land Rover LR4, Honda Ridgeline, Husqvarna FE501
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2008, 03:16:22 pm »
But no one bought these new for anywhere close to MSRP.

Offline Cord

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Carma: +104/-115
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #16 on: April 25, 2008, 06:10:49 pm »
IT is the 2005's the article lists as $22K Now...$59K NEW......... ::) :P

Sheesh, do I have to fill in all the blanks? You're the one stating $60K to $20K depreciation in 3.5 years.

Okay, so doing the same search for 2005s shows 27 available, one of which is $21995 with next cheapest being $24998. Must be some special math that comes up with $22K as average retail.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2008, 06:12:47 pm by Cord »

Offline sailor723

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 15678
  • Carma: +417/-1000
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: '17 BMW X5 Xdrive35i, '11 BMW 328iXdrive,
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #17 on: April 25, 2008, 07:17:21 pm »
Don't forget dealers/brokers have brought in a lot of high end late model used cars such as these from the US in the last year. I don't know what an 05 V6 AWD listed for in the US but I bet it was around 40K. I wonder if the US imports may have depressed the used values in this market segment and caused the depreciation to seem overly large?

Offline safristi

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 46229
  • Carma: +471/-416
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cars: since the beginning of Saf timeLOTUS ELAN,STANDARD... 10, MG midget, MGB (2),Mazda Millennia,Hyundai Veloster and 1997 Ford Ranger 2014 Subaru Forester XT
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #18 on: April 26, 2008, 01:52:54 pm »
Hey keep yer CORDS on fella......read the frickin' article and take it up with the AUTHOR....like I give a F***..................lets split the difference and say they will be worth SH*T in 3 more years..................did ya win one onna dealer cruise???? ::) :P

Offline Cord

  • Car Crazy
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Carma: +104/-115
    • View Profile
Re: CD Article: Cadillac SRX, 2004-2007
« Reply #19 on: April 26, 2008, 02:08:54 pm »
I was taking it up with the author. You're the one that misread the frickin' article.